Mickum, George Brent - short clip - ThereIsNoLaw
Loading the media player...
Transcript
Transcripts may contain inaccuracies.
| - | The bigger problem I have is | 0:00 |
| that the Obama administration has been much more insidious. | 0:03 | |
| As I said before... | 0:07 | |
| They've basically clamped down. | 0:11 | |
| We're not allowed to talk about anything. | 0:12 | |
| I mean, let me just give you a real basic example. | 0:14 | |
| Bush, Cheney, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Rumsfeld, | 0:19 | |
| and countless others. | 0:26 | |
| Oh, well, most recently this guy Rodriguez from CIA | 0:28 | |
| and tenant from the CIA have all written books talking | 0:32 | |
| about my client's torture. | 0:35 | |
| They all admitted that he's been waterboarded. | 0:38 | |
| Hayden admitted, admitted that they destroyed 90 videotapes. | 0:40 | |
| Everybody has conceded it was legal. | 0:46 | |
| We've got these memorandum right here from John Hugh. | 0:48 | |
| we know all this information. | 0:51 | |
| Can my client, through me. | 0:53 | |
| tell people what it was like to be waterboarded? | 0:58 | |
| Well, what is what the other enhanced interrogation | 1:00 | |
| techniques were like? | 1:03 | |
| Nah. And why is that? | 1:04 | |
| Well, because everything that he says is presumably | 1:07 | |
| classified at the top secret level. | 1:11 | |
| It's ridiculous. | 1:13 | |
| Interviewer | Who, who made that decision? | 1:14 |
| - | The government, DOJ made that decision. | 1:17 |
| Interviewer | Was that under the Obama administration? | 1:18 |
| - | Well, no, it was made under Bush | 1:20 |
| but it we've tried to get it relaxed. | 1:22 | |
| And Obama has, | 1:25 | |
| well under Obama it's become much more difficult | 1:28 | |
| to get any information out. | 1:31 | |
| If I've signed a deck, get my client to sign a declaration. | 1:32 | |
| They won't clear it. | 1:36 | |
| They're telling me now that I have to tell them | 1:37 | |
| the reason why I want to use the declaration. | 1:40 | |
| I mentioned the declaration to authorize the | 1:42 | |
| Polish litigation, where he was in prison on the black side. | 1:46 | |
| They would never clear that. | 1:50 | |
| And the reason is, I wouldn't give him the reason why. | 1:51 | |
| Now it would be easy enough for me to say, | 1:55 | |
| we want to initiate litigation in Poland. | 1:57 | |
| Had I done that? | 1:59 | |
| I'm sure they would have said no. | 2:01 | |
| Well, that doesn't have anything to do with habeas Corpus. | 2:02 | |
| So we're not going to do it, but I couldn't do that. | 2:05 | |
| Even if I wanted to, because to divulge my thoughts | 2:08 | |
| and strategies would be to violate | 2:14 | |
| the term of the work product doctrine. | 2:17 | |
| And I can't give up my work product. | 2:19 | |
| I mean, that's not something I'm going to do. | 2:21 | |
| And I'm certainly not going to tell my opponents | 2:23 | |
| the very line attorneys who are handling the case | 2:26 | |
| against Abu Zubaydah and let them make the determination as | 2:29 | |
| to whether it's a good use or not. | 2:33 | |
| That's ridiculous. | 2:34 | |
| I mean, but this is what, this is where the law has gone | 2:35 | |
| with regard to these detainees. | 2:39 | |
| There is no law. | 2:40 | |
| They can get away with it and they know they can get | 2:42 | |
| away with it. | 2:44 | |
| And unless, and until we can get some judges | 2:46 | |
| who really have got some balls to step in and say, | 2:50 | |
| I don't care whether the DC circuit reverses me, | 2:55 | |
| this is wrong, and this is my decision. | 2:59 | |
| And I'm ordering this guy released. | 3:02 |
Item Info
The preservation of the Duke University Libraries Digital Collections and the Duke Digital Repository programs are supported in part by the Lowell and Eileen Aptman Digital Preservation Fund