Pwosè Raboto, 19yèm jounen: Diskisyon (1)

  • Skip to Item Info
Loading the media player...

Item Info

Title:
Pwosè Raboto, 19yèm jounen: Diskisyon (1)
Alternative Title:
  • Procès de Raboteau : Débats (1)
  • Raboteau trial, day 19: Arguments (1)
Program Name:
Procès de Raboteau
Speaker:
Date:
October 26, 2000
Description:

  • Diskisyon pete pandan pwosè Raboto a, aprè prezidan tribinal Napela Saintil bay lòd pou yo retire plizyè akize (Wilson Casséus, Norélus Mondélus, Castera Cénafils, ak Amazan Jean-Libert) anndan tribinal la epi mennen yo tounen nan prizon. Deba yo konsène yon pyès ki sipoze egziste men ki pa t soumèt anvan, siyen pa Jeneral Raoul Cédras, ki gen ladan l yon lis tout sòlda ki te Gonayiv pandan masak Raboto a. Avoka defans yo deklare se yon fo pyès li ye, fòk li ekate. Ministè Piblik la kwè pyès sa a ka manipile repons akize yo, kidonk fòk yo retire akize yo anndan tribinal la.

  • Une dispute a éclaté durant le procès de Raboteau, après la décision du président du tribunal, Napela Saintil, de renvoyer en prison plusieurs accusés: Wilson Casséus, Norélus Mondélus, Castera Cénafils, et Amazan Jean-Libert. Le débat concernait une pièce existante mais qui n’avait pas été soumise auparavant. Cette pièce, signée par Raoul Cédras, donne la liste de tous les soldats présents aux Gonaïves pendant le massacre de Raboteau. Les avocats de la défense déclarent que c’est un faux, qu’on doit l’écarter. Le ministère public croit que cette pièce peut influencer les réponses des accusés, c’est pourquoi ils doivent quitter le tribunal.

  • Arguments break out among the lawyers during the Raboteau trial, after judge Napela Saintil orders the removal of several defendants (Wilson Casséus, Norélus Mondélus, Castera Cénafils, and Amazan Jean-Libert) to prison. These arguments primarily concern a purported document that was not previously submitted as evidence, signed by General Raoul Cédras, that supposedly contains a list of all the soldiers who were present in Gonaïves at the time of the Raboteau massacre. Defense attorneys argue that the document is a forgery and should be eliminated. The Ministère Public argues that this document might influence the defendants' responses, and so they should be removed from the courtroom.

Program Type:
Court Proceeding
Subject:
Location:
Language:
Tape ID:
RL10059CS1691
Rights:
Limited Re-Use
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Rights Note:
This recording may contain material that was not originally created by Radio Haiti and therefore not covered by the Creative Commons license indicated here. For more information see https://repository.duke.edu/dc/radiohaiti/about#copyright.
Digital Collection:
Radio Haiti Archive
Source Collection:
Radio Haiti audio recordings, 1957-2003
Related Resources:
See below
Identifier:
  • 510032b67892752f93af5317248f214e
  • radiohaiti
  • duke:623071
  • RL10059-CS-1691_01
  • ark:/87924/r4st7jw3v
  • d66b558d-c589-4a17-884a-44dd765e281e
Permalink:
https://idn.duke.edu/ark:/87924/r4st7jw3v
Sponsor:
Sponsor this Digital Collection