﻿WEBVTT

1
00:00:06.463 --> 00:00:08.030
<v Interviewer>Ready? Okay, okay.</v>

2
00:00:08.030 --> 00:00:09.390
Good afternoon.

3
00:00:09.390 --> 00:00:11.930
And we are very grateful to you for participating

4
00:00:11.930 --> 00:00:14.950
in our Witness to Guantanamo project.

5
00:00:14.950 --> 00:00:17.410
We invite you to speak about your experiences

6
00:00:17.410 --> 00:00:20.120
regarding Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

7
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:22.620
We are hoping to provide you with an opportunity

8
00:00:22.620 --> 00:00:26.180
to tell your story in your own words.

9
00:00:26.180 --> 00:00:28.060
We are creating an archive of stories

10
00:00:28.060 --> 00:00:30.870
so that people in America and around the world

11
00:00:30.870 --> 00:00:32.160
will have a better understanding

12
00:00:32.160 --> 00:00:35.040
of what you and others have seen and experienced

13
00:00:35.040 --> 00:00:38.653
over the past 8 1/2 years regarding Guantanamo.

14
00:00:39.570 --> 00:00:42.080
Future generations must know what happened,

15
00:00:42.080 --> 00:00:45.290
and by telling your story, you are contributing to history.

16
00:00:45.290 --> 00:00:48.480
We appreciate your courage and willingness to speak with us.

17
00:00:48.480 --> 00:00:50.690
If at any time during the interview,

18
00:00:50.690 --> 00:00:53.410
you would like to take a break, please let us know.

19
00:00:53.410 --> 00:00:56.680
And if you say something you did not mean to say

20
00:00:56.680 --> 00:00:58.440
and would like to remove it, please tell us,

21
00:00:58.440 --> 00:01:00.740
and we'll remove it.

22
00:01:00.740 --> 00:01:02.940
So I'd like to just begin with some general information

23
00:01:02.940 --> 00:01:07.940
about you, your name and a little background,

24
00:01:08.340 --> 00:01:10.770
Erwin, just so that we have it.

25
00:01:10.770 --> 00:01:13.500
<v ->Sure. My name is Erwin Chemerinsky.</v>

26
00:01:13.500 --> 00:01:15.040
I'm dean and professor of law

27
00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:18.060
at the University of California Irvine School of Law.

28
00:01:18.060 --> 00:01:21.367
Before that, I was a professor of law at Duke University,

29
00:01:21.367 --> 00:01:23.520
before that, a professor of law

30
00:01:23.520 --> 00:01:25.050
at the University of Southern California

31
00:01:25.050 --> 00:01:26.833
and what's relevant is I began representing

32
00:01:26.833 --> 00:01:29.260
a Guantanamo detainee at USC,

33
00:01:29.260 --> 00:01:32.007
continued to just as I was on the faculty at Duke

34
00:01:32.007 --> 00:01:33.480
and continue to do so since I've come

35
00:01:33.480 --> 00:01:35.350
to the University of California, Irvine.

36
00:01:35.350 --> 00:01:36.620
<v Interviewer>I think it's also relevant</v>

37
00:01:36.620 --> 00:01:39.120
if you can tell us a little bit about your history,

38
00:01:39.120 --> 00:01:41.820
going back in terms of your civil liberties,

39
00:01:41.820 --> 00:01:43.310
civil rights experiences.

40
00:01:43.310 --> 00:01:45.710
Just generally, just a few things.

41
00:01:45.710 --> 00:01:50.120
<v ->Sure. I'd been a law professor for 30 years.</v>

42
00:01:50.120 --> 00:01:53.760
I did public interest law after law school before that.

43
00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:56.140
Since becoming a law professor,

44
00:01:56.140 --> 00:01:59.650
I've been involved in handling appellate cases.

45
00:01:59.650 --> 00:02:01.890
All are civil liberties, civil rights cases.

46
00:02:01.890 --> 00:02:04.560
I've done virtually all of them pro bono.

47
00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:08.190
I've argued over 100 appeals in various courts of appeals

48
00:02:08.190 --> 00:02:11.140
including several cases in the United States Supreme Court.

49
00:02:13.660 --> 00:02:17.180
<v Interviewer>And can you give us just a little background</v>

50
00:02:17.180 --> 00:02:18.571
on your schooling too?

51
00:02:18.571 --> 00:02:19.686
Do you want to go there?
<v ->Sure.</v>

52
00:02:19.686 --> 00:02:22.070
I went to Northwestern University

53
00:02:22.070 --> 00:02:23.853
and then I went to Harvard law school.

54
00:02:24.890 --> 00:02:26.670
<v Interviewer>So we'd like to begin</v>

55
00:02:26.670 --> 00:02:29.340
with your first involvement with Guantanamo.

56
00:02:29.340 --> 00:02:32.380
And if you could explain what motivated you,

57
00:02:32.380 --> 00:02:34.720
what caused you to get involved?

58
00:02:34.720 --> 00:02:37.540
<v ->The first reports of the Guantanamo detainees</v>

59
00:02:37.540 --> 00:02:39.110
being brought there

60
00:02:39.110 --> 00:02:43.370
were over Martin Luther King Day weekend in 2002.

61
00:02:43.370 --> 00:02:45.970
I received a phone call from a civil rights lawyer

62
00:02:45.970 --> 00:02:48.160
in Los Angeles, Stephen Yagman.

63
00:02:48.160 --> 00:02:50.900
He was very upset at the reports he was hearing

64
00:02:50.900 --> 00:02:55.370
of individuals being brought bound, gagged and drugged

65
00:02:55.370 --> 00:02:56.920
on military planes,

66
00:02:56.920 --> 00:03:00.400
being put in 8 foot by 8 foot cages in Guantanamo.

67
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:03.630
He said somebody should file a lawsuit on their behalf

68
00:03:03.630 --> 00:03:06.880
because what's being done violates international law

69
00:03:06.880 --> 00:03:08.820
and the United States Constitution.

70
00:03:08.820 --> 00:03:12.410
I had worked with Mr. Yagman on many cases before

71
00:03:12.410 --> 00:03:16.760
and so was quite willing to work with him again.

72
00:03:16.760 --> 00:03:19.210
I did some research over that weekend

73
00:03:19.210 --> 00:03:22.400
that it is permissible to file a habeas corpus petition

74
00:03:22.400 --> 00:03:23.970
on behalf of another.

75
00:03:23.970 --> 00:03:25.570
It's even possible to do so

76
00:03:25.570 --> 00:03:27.940
without that individual's consent.

77
00:03:27.940 --> 00:03:31.340
I did the research in terms of the likelihood of success

78
00:03:31.340 --> 00:03:32.970
in terms of such a challenge

79
00:03:32.970 --> 00:03:34.420
and also research in terms of

80
00:03:34.420 --> 00:03:36.930
where does such a lawsuit have to be brought.

81
00:03:36.930 --> 00:03:40.360
And Mr. Yagman drafted a complaint on behalf of

82
00:03:40.360 --> 00:03:44.150
a coalition of clergy members, journalists, and professors

83
00:03:44.150 --> 00:03:46.260
and he filed it on an emergency basis

84
00:03:46.260 --> 00:03:48.030
in federal district court in Los Angeles

85
00:03:48.030 --> 00:03:50.648
on the Monday of Martin Luther King Day weekend.

86
00:03:50.648 --> 00:03:51.481
<v Interviewer>And what motivated you</v>

87
00:03:51.481 --> 00:03:53.073
to get involved with him in that?

88
00:03:54.470 --> 00:03:56.990
<v ->I shared Mr. Yagman's concern</v>

89
00:03:56.990 --> 00:04:00.580
that the United States was violating international law,

90
00:04:00.580 --> 00:04:02.100
to say nothing of American law.

91
00:04:02.100 --> 00:04:03.480
And I was very concerned

92
00:04:03.480 --> 00:04:05.980
there was no one there to represent the detainees.

93
00:04:05.980 --> 00:04:08.710
It seemed highly unlikely that they would have

94
00:04:08.710 --> 00:04:11.640
family members wherever they were coming from

95
00:04:11.640 --> 00:04:13.300
with the means or the knowledge

96
00:04:13.300 --> 00:04:16.030
to represent them at this stage.

97
00:04:16.030 --> 00:04:17.520
No other lawyers were involved.

98
00:04:17.520 --> 00:04:19.870
This was long before the law firms got involved

99
00:04:19.870 --> 00:04:21.117
in representing detainees

100
00:04:21.117 --> 00:04:24.704
and there was really a sense of, it was us or no one

101
00:04:24.704 --> 00:04:27.550
to protect them and to enforce the law.

102
00:04:27.550 --> 00:04:28.383
<v Interviewer>Could you tell us a little bit</v>

103
00:04:28.383 --> 00:04:30.710
about what happened after you filed the lawsuit?

104
00:04:31.990 --> 00:04:33.460
<v ->The lawsuit was filed</v>

105
00:04:33.460 --> 00:04:36.660
on the Monday of Martin Luther King day weekend.

106
00:04:36.660 --> 00:04:39.680
My name was on it as co-counsel.

107
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:43.210
By coincidence I was flying from Los Angeles, where I lived,

108
00:04:43.210 --> 00:04:45.010
to New York, where I was giving a speech

109
00:04:45.010 --> 00:04:46.600
the next day, Tuesday.

110
00:04:46.600 --> 00:04:49.700
And when I landed after midnight in New York,

111
00:04:49.700 --> 00:04:51.470
I turned on my cell phone

112
00:04:51.470 --> 00:04:54.330
and the message box was completely full.

113
00:04:54.330 --> 00:04:58.520
It was entirely messages from journalists at that stage,

114
00:04:58.520 --> 00:05:00.890
all of whom wanted to interview me.

115
00:05:00.890 --> 00:05:02.280
I had invitations to appear

116
00:05:02.280 --> 00:05:05.600
on all of the morning talk shows the next day.

117
00:05:05.600 --> 00:05:06.710
Now I think the logistics

118
00:05:06.710 --> 00:05:09.310
of my speaking commitment made it impossible.

119
00:05:09.310 --> 00:05:11.420
I also made the choice

120
00:05:11.420 --> 00:05:13.560
that the complaint should speak for itself,

121
00:05:13.560 --> 00:05:14.850
that I didn't want to be seen

122
00:05:14.850 --> 00:05:17.280
that I was doing this to get publicity.

123
00:05:17.280 --> 00:05:19.970
One of the mistakes, in hindsight,

124
00:05:19.970 --> 00:05:22.550
was not accepting those media invitations

125
00:05:22.550 --> 00:05:24.770
because I think what I missed was the opportunity

126
00:05:24.770 --> 00:05:27.260
to say to whoever was listening

127
00:05:27.260 --> 00:05:30.300
that the United States wasn't following international law,

128
00:05:30.300 --> 00:05:32.890
wasn't following our own constitutional principles.

129
00:05:32.890 --> 00:05:36.520
The reality is a complaint is read by relatively few people.

130
00:05:36.520 --> 00:05:40.410
I was given a national platform. I didn't use it.

131
00:05:40.410 --> 00:05:43.340
And no one was expressing that view at that time.

132
00:05:43.340 --> 00:05:45.260
The other thing that happened was

133
00:05:45.260 --> 00:05:46.850
when I woke up the next morning,

134
00:05:46.850 --> 00:05:51.850
I turned on my computer and I had well over 200 emails.

135
00:05:52.424 --> 00:05:55.220
They were the most nasty and vicious emails

136
00:05:55.220 --> 00:05:57.083
I think I had received to that point.

137
00:05:57.920 --> 00:06:01.100
Many wished me and my family dead.

138
00:06:01.100 --> 00:06:03.250
This was January of 2002.

139
00:06:03.250 --> 00:06:05.650
It was just several months after September 11th.

140
00:06:05.650 --> 00:06:09.440
And I discovered that people were not at all sympathetic

141
00:06:09.440 --> 00:06:11.700
to representing Guantanamo detainees

142
00:06:11.700 --> 00:06:13.140
or asserting their rights.

143
00:06:13.140 --> 00:06:16.260
I found that even people who I knew, who were friends,

144
00:06:16.260 --> 00:06:19.740
were enormously critical in me being involved in this case.

145
00:06:19.740 --> 00:06:22.777
<v ->How did you respond to those emails and to your friends?</v>

146
00:06:24.960 --> 00:06:26.390
<v ->I took the position then,</v>

147
00:06:26.390 --> 00:06:28.230
and I've continued to follow it since,

148
00:06:28.230 --> 00:06:31.800
that any email that's nasty, I delete,

149
00:06:31.800 --> 00:06:34.150
that I don't respond, I don't engage.

150
00:06:34.150 --> 00:06:36.170
Any that's a reasoned argument,

151
00:06:36.170 --> 00:06:38.530
I'll respond by thanking them for writing

152
00:06:38.530 --> 00:06:40.420
but I generally won't engage.

153
00:06:40.420 --> 00:06:42.500
And for friends, I will engage

154
00:06:42.500 --> 00:06:44.867
and had some very heated discussions with people.

155
00:06:44.867 --> 00:06:48.300
Later that week, I was in New York to do a lecture

156
00:06:48.300 --> 00:06:49.550
and had dinner with some friends

157
00:06:49.550 --> 00:06:51.060
and it turned into very heated discussion

158
00:06:51.060 --> 00:06:52.940
of their not understanding how I could represent

159
00:06:52.940 --> 00:06:54.100
the Guantanamo detainees

160
00:06:54.100 --> 00:06:56.240
and my not understanding how they couldn't believe

161
00:06:56.240 --> 00:06:58.402
that these people deserve representation.

162
00:06:58.402 --> 00:07:00.590
<v Interviewer>Did people call you unpatriotic?</v>

163
00:07:00.590 --> 00:07:01.990
<v ->And much worse too.</v>

164
00:07:01.990 --> 00:07:04.180
There were plenty who called me unpatriotic.

165
00:07:04.180 --> 00:07:06.720
Literally, and I'm not exaggerating the least,

166
00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:08.800
the ones that said "I hope you and your family die

167
00:07:08.800 --> 00:07:10.347
in a bin Laden bombing."

168
00:07:11.580 --> 00:07:14.398
There were enough phone calls that day that

169
00:07:14.398 --> 00:07:19.310
one of the assistants at school called campus security

170
00:07:19.310 --> 00:07:21.200
feeling threatened by the phone calls that came

171
00:07:21.200 --> 00:07:23.340
and the campus security came in and investigated me.

172
00:07:23.340 --> 00:07:26.900
And my response was, "But I didn't do anything wrong here."

173
00:07:26.900 --> 00:07:28.230
<v Interviewer>How'd your family handle?</v>

174
00:07:28.230 --> 00:07:31.610
Did they get any comments or...

175
00:07:31.610 --> 00:07:33.510
<v ->At the beginning I was forwarding</v>

176
00:07:33.510 --> 00:07:36.800
some of the more outlandish messages to my wife

177
00:07:36.800 --> 00:07:39.940
just to sort of share what I was receiving.

178
00:07:39.940 --> 00:07:41.850
Then she said she just didn't want to see them.

179
00:07:41.850 --> 00:07:44.620
And after that, we just didn't talk about it.

180
00:07:44.620 --> 00:07:47.320
I think that I mentioned in passing

181
00:07:47.320 --> 00:07:49.570
to a Daily Journal reporter

182
00:07:49.570 --> 00:07:51.040
the nature of the email I received

183
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:52.060
and he said, "Send them to me."

184
00:07:52.060 --> 00:07:54.480
And I forwarded him a sample.

185
00:07:54.480 --> 00:07:56.190
And then I think he wrote a column

186
00:07:56.190 --> 00:08:00.000
in the Daily Journal that quoted and summarized these.

187
00:08:00.000 --> 00:08:01.910
So there's still some record of them.

188
00:08:01.910 --> 00:08:04.070
But to say they were vicious and nasty

189
00:08:04.070 --> 00:08:05.500
is a tremendous understatement.

190
00:08:05.500 --> 00:08:07.600
To say they bothered me, they really didn't.

191
00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:09.840
I mean, I didn't feel personally threatened.

192
00:08:09.840 --> 00:08:12.040
I didn't think that anybody was going to come after me.

193
00:08:12.040 --> 00:08:14.360
I just hadn't realized the nerve

194
00:08:14.360 --> 00:08:16.330
that this touched for people

195
00:08:16.330 --> 00:08:19.680
and their sense that the individuals of Guantanamo

196
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:21.652
shouldn't have representation.

197
00:08:21.652 --> 00:08:22.485
I mean, it's interesting.

198
00:08:22.485 --> 00:08:24.196
Oh, go ahead.
<v ->Sorry.</v>

199
00:08:24.196 --> 00:08:27.890
We talk now in February, March 2010,

200
00:08:27.890 --> 00:08:30.040
which is eight years later.

201
00:08:30.040 --> 00:08:32.780
And it's so interesting that just last week,

202
00:08:32.780 --> 00:08:35.597
there's sharp criticism from some of the lawyers

203
00:08:35.597 --> 00:08:37.870
who were representing Guantanamo detainees

204
00:08:37.870 --> 00:08:40.730
so one would think after eight years that it passed

205
00:08:40.730 --> 00:08:42.180
but it hasn't completely, so.

206
00:08:43.198 --> 00:08:45.220
<v Interviewer>Did the FBI ever contact you</v>

207
00:08:45.220 --> 00:08:47.330
after your name came out or (indistinct).

208
00:08:47.330 --> 00:08:48.480
<v ->The only time the FBI contact me</v>

209
00:08:48.480 --> 00:08:50.640
was when I applied for my security clearance

210
00:08:50.640 --> 00:08:52.140
in connection with representing a detainee

211
00:08:52.140 --> 00:08:53.740
and wanting to go to Guantanamo.

212
00:08:54.636 --> 00:08:58.740
<v Interviewer>And subsequently, what happened?</v>

213
00:08:58.740 --> 00:09:00.017
I don't want the particulars of the lawsuit,

214
00:09:00.017 --> 00:09:01.530
but what happened then in terms

215
00:09:01.530 --> 00:09:03.360
of your involvement with Guantanamo,

216
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:06.343
how did you end up getting involved with detainees?

217
00:09:09.500 --> 00:09:12.340
<v ->I argued the case in federal district court</v>

218
00:09:12.340 --> 00:09:15.410
in Los Angeles in February.

219
00:09:15.410 --> 00:09:18.290
Paul Clement, the then deputy solicitor general,

220
00:09:18.290 --> 00:09:20.270
flew out from Washington to argue the other side

221
00:09:20.270 --> 00:09:22.720
which showed how seriously the government was taking this.

222
00:09:22.720 --> 00:09:25.810
The judge dismissed the case and then I argued it

223
00:09:25.810 --> 00:09:26.900
in the United States Court of Appeals

224
00:09:26.900 --> 00:09:29.010
for the Ninth Circuit in July.

225
00:09:29.010 --> 00:09:31.630
Paul Clement, again, flew out to argue

226
00:09:31.630 --> 00:09:33.210
for the United States.

227
00:09:33.210 --> 00:09:37.830
The Los Angeles Times wrote a story about the argument

228
00:09:37.830 --> 00:09:42.830
and the brother of a detainee, Salem Ghareby's brother,

229
00:09:42.917 --> 00:09:46.727
Baleid Ghareby, contacted Mr. Yagman and said,

230
00:09:46.727 --> 00:09:49.490
"I have a brother in Guantanamo.

231
00:09:49.490 --> 00:09:51.530
Would you represent him?"

232
00:09:51.530 --> 00:09:53.957
Since ultimately both the federal district court

233
00:09:53.957 --> 00:09:56.520
and the Ninth Circuit dismissed on grounds

234
00:09:56.520 --> 00:09:58.350
that we didn't have standing, that we didn't have

235
00:09:58.350 --> 00:10:00.610
a sufficient relationship with the detainee,

236
00:10:00.610 --> 00:10:03.850
this then ended that issue and allowed us to go forward

237
00:10:03.850 --> 00:10:05.540
on behalf of a particular individual.

238
00:10:05.540 --> 00:10:09.130
So we asked the court whether we could simply

239
00:10:09.130 --> 00:10:10.830
amend our complaint,

240
00:10:10.830 --> 00:10:12.860
that instead of representing all the detainees

241
00:10:12.860 --> 00:10:14.770
we'd represent this one detainee

242
00:10:14.770 --> 00:10:16.490
but that the complaint would be the same.

243
00:10:16.490 --> 00:10:18.180
The judge said yes, we could do that.

244
00:10:18.180 --> 00:10:20.480
And they dismissed the complaint nonetheless.

245
00:10:20.480 --> 00:10:22.338
And then we went to the Ninth Circuit

246
00:10:22.338 --> 00:10:23.588
and we won in December 2003.

247
00:10:23.588 --> 00:10:25.600
<v Interviewer>What did you win?</v>

248
00:10:25.600 --> 00:10:28.010
<v ->The Ninth Circuit ruled that we could go forward</v>

249
00:10:28.010 --> 00:10:30.970
with a lawsuit on behalf of a Guantanamo detainee,

250
00:10:30.970 --> 00:10:33.430
that we could file a habeas corpus petition

251
00:10:33.430 --> 00:10:35.420
on behalf of Salem Ghareby.

252
00:10:35.420 --> 00:10:37.312
This is the same conclusion that

253
00:10:37.312 --> 00:10:39.680
the United States Supreme Court came to

254
00:10:39.680 --> 00:10:42.950
in June of 2004 in Rasul v. Bush,

255
00:10:42.950 --> 00:10:45.560
though I can say in all honesty

256
00:10:45.560 --> 00:10:48.220
that I was part of winning the first case

257
00:10:48.220 --> 00:10:50.620
on behalf of a Guantanamo detainee in any court.

258
00:10:51.620 --> 00:10:53.010
<v Interviewer>Were you ever working</v>

259
00:10:53.010 --> 00:10:55.200
with the attorneys in the East Coast

260
00:10:55.200 --> 00:10:58.270
on any of these cases, or you were pretty much a loner

261
00:10:58.270 --> 00:10:59.210
in all of this?

262
00:11:00.620 --> 00:11:04.630
<v ->We started before any of the lawyers on the East Coast</v>

263
00:11:04.630 --> 00:11:06.630
were representing detainees.

264
00:11:06.630 --> 00:11:09.520
Though by the time the case even got to the Ninth Circuit,

265
00:11:09.520 --> 00:11:13.650
the first of the family members had contacted lawyers

266
00:11:13.650 --> 00:11:14.810
and had presentation.

267
00:11:14.810 --> 00:11:16.860
And certainly after a while,

268
00:11:16.860 --> 00:11:18.430
there were many law firms involved

269
00:11:18.430 --> 00:11:19.690
in representing detainees.

270
00:11:19.690 --> 00:11:22.870
There is a listserv among Guantanamo lawyers,

271
00:11:22.870 --> 00:11:27.870
and I certainly benefited from that listserv,

272
00:11:27.900 --> 00:11:29.540
at times when the case was very involved

273
00:11:29.540 --> 00:11:31.020
and there were certain lawyers

274
00:11:31.020 --> 00:11:33.230
who I was in closer communication with

275
00:11:33.230 --> 00:11:35.430
and benefited from their counsel and wisdom.

276
00:11:36.640 --> 00:11:39.370
<v Interviewer>And when did you finally get to go?</v>

277
00:11:39.370 --> 00:11:41.680
Did you apply to go to Guantanamo soon after that,

278
00:11:41.680 --> 00:11:43.860
or when did you first apply?

279
00:11:43.860 --> 00:11:47.770
<v ->I applied for security clearance</v>

280
00:11:48.610 --> 00:11:51.620
in the fall of 2004,

281
00:11:51.620 --> 00:11:53.770
which is after the Supreme Court said

282
00:11:53.770 --> 00:11:56.070
that the Guantanamo detainees could go forward

283
00:11:56.070 --> 00:11:57.623
with habeas corpus petitions.

284
00:11:58.800 --> 00:12:00.260
As is the nature of these things,

285
00:12:00.260 --> 00:12:05.260
it took some time for them to process me and gain approval.

286
00:12:05.370 --> 00:12:07.310
All I remember is it took a while,

287
00:12:07.310 --> 00:12:10.890
and then it took a while to get the schedule,

288
00:12:10.890 --> 00:12:13.240
to go down to see my client for the first time.

289
00:12:14.340 --> 00:12:16.550
There were many instances of false starts,

290
00:12:16.550 --> 00:12:21.000
of scheduling it and they would cancel.

291
00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:23.079
Scheduling it, they would cancel.

292
00:12:23.079 --> 00:12:23.943
<v Interviewer>Who's "they"?</v>

293
00:12:23.943 --> 00:12:25.570
They being the representatives

294
00:12:25.570 --> 00:12:28.230
of the Department of Defense, who I was dealing with.

295
00:12:28.230 --> 00:12:29.940
<v Interviewer>You had to schedule with them?</v>

296
00:12:29.940 --> 00:12:31.260
<v ->That's correct.</v>

297
00:12:31.260 --> 00:12:33.440
<v Interviewer>And were you not permitted to apply</v>

298
00:12:33.440 --> 00:12:37.490
soon as you had won that case in November of '03?

299
00:12:37.490 --> 00:12:41.470
<v ->Well, when we won our case in December of '03,</v>

300
00:12:41.470 --> 00:12:43.868
that case, the government then sought cert on,

301
00:12:43.868 --> 00:12:45.697
a Supreme Court review on,

302
00:12:45.697 --> 00:12:48.550
and that case was held pending the Supreme Court's

303
00:12:48.550 --> 00:12:51.150
deciding the two cases from the DC Circuit,

304
00:12:51.150 --> 00:12:52.810
Rasul and al Odah.

305
00:12:52.810 --> 00:12:56.370
So I don't think anybody was cleared for security clearances

306
00:12:56.370 --> 00:12:59.400
until the Supreme Court had decided Rasul in June 2004.

307
00:12:59.400 --> 00:13:02.990
And I immediately applied for security clearance then,

308
00:13:02.990 --> 00:13:07.227
and after the Rasul case came down,

309
00:13:07.227 --> 00:13:09.920
our case also went to the district court.

310
00:13:09.920 --> 00:13:11.743
We were assigned to Reggie Walton.

311
00:13:13.413 --> 00:13:15.660
Our case was filed in Los Angeles.

312
00:13:15.660 --> 00:13:17.640
One of the things that the Supreme Court decided

313
00:13:17.640 --> 00:13:19.210
in June of 2004

314
00:13:19.210 --> 00:13:21.540
was that habeas petitions needed to be brought

315
00:13:21.540 --> 00:13:23.800
in the district where somebody was held,

316
00:13:23.800 --> 00:13:25.590
or if someone's held outside the country,

317
00:13:25.590 --> 00:13:27.920
in the district where the custodian was located.

318
00:13:27.920 --> 00:13:31.020
So our case got transferred to Washington, DC

319
00:13:31.020 --> 00:13:32.820
in the federal district court there.

320
00:13:34.200 --> 00:13:36.968
<v Interviewer>You described some of the problems</v>

321
00:13:36.968 --> 00:13:39.142
that DOD threw in front of you.

322
00:13:39.142 --> 00:13:43.233
You said you couldn't get your permission so easily.

323
00:13:45.150 --> 00:13:46.980
<v ->Obviously the largest was just waiting</v>

324
00:13:46.980 --> 00:13:48.950
for the security clearance.

325
00:13:48.950 --> 00:13:52.400
It did come, but it took many months.

326
00:13:52.400 --> 00:13:54.140
In terms of coordinating visits,

327
00:13:54.140 --> 00:13:56.650
I remember having to coordinate with somebody from the DOD

328
00:13:56.650 --> 00:13:58.980
and also I think Terry Warden was his name,

329
00:13:58.980 --> 00:14:00.450
of the Department of Justice.

330
00:14:00.450 --> 00:14:03.230
And they only would allow so many at a time

331
00:14:03.230 --> 00:14:07.391
and it was dependent on their windows being available

332
00:14:07.391 --> 00:14:10.170
and the like, and there were a couple of instances

333
00:14:10.170 --> 00:14:12.510
we would schedule and it would get canceled.

334
00:14:12.510 --> 00:14:14.420
And there were certainly instances where I would schedule

335
00:14:14.420 --> 00:14:16.100
and then something would come up for me.

336
00:14:16.100 --> 00:14:18.550
So it took a while to arrange to be able to get down

337
00:14:18.550 --> 00:14:19.850
to see Mr. Ghareby.

338
00:14:19.850 --> 00:14:20.710
<v Interviewer>Had you been in touch</v>

339
00:14:20.710 --> 00:14:22.540
with Mr. Ghareby at all?

340
00:14:22.540 --> 00:14:24.590
<v ->Well, I had sent him letters to inform him</v>

341
00:14:24.590 --> 00:14:25.680
that we were representing him

342
00:14:25.680 --> 00:14:28.160
and I was in touch through Mr. Yagman

343
00:14:28.160 --> 00:14:30.630
with Mr. Ghareby's brother, Baleid.

344
00:14:30.630 --> 00:14:31.920
<v Interviewer>Do you know if Mr. Ghareby</v>

345
00:14:31.920 --> 00:14:32.990
received your letters?

346
00:14:32.990 --> 00:14:34.083
<v ->I don't recall.</v>

347
00:14:34.967 --> 00:14:36.410
<v Interviewer>Could you describe</v>

348
00:14:36.410 --> 00:14:38.080
the first time you flew down to Guantanamo

349
00:14:38.080 --> 00:14:39.233
and what that was like?

350
00:14:41.060 --> 00:14:41.963
<v ->Surreal.</v>

351
00:14:42.810 --> 00:14:47.810
It's a beautiful island with beaches,

352
00:14:48.280 --> 00:14:51.730
but with very bleak prisons there.

353
00:14:51.730 --> 00:14:53.890
I remember saying to people

354
00:14:53.890 --> 00:14:56.850
that if the United States that built luxury hotels

355
00:14:56.850 --> 00:15:00.230
rather than the garrisons that they did there

356
00:15:00.230 --> 00:15:02.663
they could have gone a long way to solving the deficit.

357
00:15:03.830 --> 00:15:06.290
<v Interviewer>And what kind of plane did you take</v>

358
00:15:06.290 --> 00:15:09.503
and how was the experience when you first got off the plane?

359
00:15:11.060 --> 00:15:14.053
<v ->I think it's Sunset Airlines, Sunrise Airlines?</v>

360
00:15:16.217 --> 00:15:18.240
But it was whatever the airline is that you take.

361
00:15:18.240 --> 00:15:19.410
And if I remember right,

362
00:15:19.410 --> 00:15:22.660
you fly to Fort Lauderdale and then change planes.

363
00:15:22.660 --> 00:15:24.910
And I was surprised,

364
00:15:24.910 --> 00:15:26.570
'cause I think of Cuba as being so close

365
00:15:26.570 --> 00:15:28.930
to the United States, that it's about a two hour flight

366
00:15:28.930 --> 00:15:31.023
from Florida to go down there.

367
00:15:32.480 --> 00:15:36.990
And one thing that was so interesting is

368
00:15:36.990 --> 00:15:41.990
how the military escorts are very young.

369
00:15:42.330 --> 00:15:45.040
Every place there's military escorts.

370
00:15:45.040 --> 00:15:50.040
And they seemed like kids to me, very officious.

371
00:15:53.134 --> 00:15:58.134
I mean, everything is very, very regimented

372
00:15:58.260 --> 00:16:02.480
and the lawyers all stay in a different place than,

373
00:16:02.480 --> 00:16:04.500
for example, journalists get to stay.

374
00:16:04.500 --> 00:16:07.050
<v Interviewer>Could you describe exactly how that was</v>

375
00:16:07.050 --> 00:16:08.210
when you got off the plane,

376
00:16:08.210 --> 00:16:10.710
and were you nervous or tense at all?

377
00:16:10.710 --> 00:16:15.710
And who met you when you got off the plane and (indistinct)

378
00:16:16.275 --> 00:16:18.890
<v ->I don't recall being nervous at all.</v>

379
00:16:18.890 --> 00:16:21.600
I didn't feel that I was in any danger going there,

380
00:16:21.600 --> 00:16:23.100
given the military presence.

381
00:16:23.100 --> 00:16:25.250
The last thing I would feel was any danger.

382
00:16:26.260 --> 00:16:30.890
I remember having to, before going there,

383
00:16:30.890 --> 00:16:32.830
have a huge amount of paperwork in order.

384
00:16:32.830 --> 00:16:36.197
And my main degree of tension was that I screw up

385
00:16:36.197 --> 00:16:37.850
and not bringing some of the papers

386
00:16:37.850 --> 00:16:39.300
that I was supposed to bring.

387
00:16:40.730 --> 00:16:43.040
There were other lawyers there

388
00:16:43.040 --> 00:16:45.070
at the same time that I was.

389
00:16:45.070 --> 00:16:45.903
And...

390
00:16:47.320 --> 00:16:48.980
<v Interviewer>And then they escort you somewhere</v>

391
00:16:48.980 --> 00:16:51.118
when you got off the plane?

392
00:16:51.118 --> 00:16:53.720
<v ->They escorted, and I remember going to the,</v>

393
00:16:53.720 --> 00:16:56.170
they took us to a barracks where we were staying.

394
00:16:57.164 --> 00:17:01.540
And I remember that you can't have a cell phone there

395
00:17:01.540 --> 00:17:03.160
but you can buy calling cards

396
00:17:03.160 --> 00:17:05.590
and using the calling cards to call home.

397
00:17:05.590 --> 00:17:07.080
<v Interviewer>And how was it the next morning</v>

398
00:17:07.080 --> 00:17:08.580
when you went to visit your client?

399
00:17:08.580 --> 00:17:10.520
Could you describe that?

400
00:17:10.520 --> 00:17:12.540
<v ->I remember having to go over water.</v>

401
00:17:12.540 --> 00:17:13.587
I remember you took a boat

402
00:17:13.587 --> 00:17:15.840
and then to get from where the lawyers stay

403
00:17:15.840 --> 00:17:17.940
to where the detainees are,

404
00:17:17.940 --> 00:17:20.370
that you go over water.

405
00:17:20.370 --> 00:17:25.270
I remember that the military personnel were very officious.

406
00:17:25.270 --> 00:17:27.070
I remember that the other lawyers,

407
00:17:27.070 --> 00:17:28.230
at least some of them who were there,

408
00:17:28.230 --> 00:17:30.440
only a few had been before

409
00:17:30.440 --> 00:17:32.580
and so had more of a chatting relationship

410
00:17:32.580 --> 00:17:34.223
with the military officers.

411
00:17:36.870 --> 00:17:40.267
And we had a translator with us

412
00:17:40.267 --> 00:17:45.267
and I remember being taken to the place

413
00:17:46.500 --> 00:17:49.430
where we were able to talk to Mr. Ghareby.

414
00:17:49.430 --> 00:17:51.300
And most of all, what I was struck by

415
00:17:51.300 --> 00:17:53.000
was the chance to see him.

416
00:17:53.000 --> 00:17:54.150
As you can tell, I don't remember

417
00:17:54.150 --> 00:17:56.640
that many of the details of the island.

418
00:17:56.640 --> 00:17:58.990
I was there and I remember how beautiful it was

419
00:17:58.990 --> 00:18:00.710
and how bleak the garrisons

420
00:18:00.710 --> 00:18:04.020
but it was really striking where we talked to Mr. Ghareby.

421
00:18:04.020 --> 00:18:08.083
It was a dirt floor.

422
00:18:08.920 --> 00:18:13.593
He was shackled and chained to his chair.

423
00:18:14.630 --> 00:18:17.613
There was a small table not unlike the table next to me.

424
00:18:19.390 --> 00:18:21.523
I was there. The interpreter was there.

425
00:18:24.440 --> 00:18:29.053
And it was very powerful to see him as a person.

426
00:18:30.090 --> 00:18:31.770
One of the things that I've tried to do

427
00:18:31.770 --> 00:18:34.060
as I've talked about Guantanamo

428
00:18:34.060 --> 00:18:35.800
is to describe as a person

429
00:18:35.800 --> 00:18:36.920
'cause I think it's one thing

430
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:39.710
if it's just the number of people that are there

431
00:18:39.710 --> 00:18:41.740
or if they get characterized in some way

432
00:18:41.740 --> 00:18:45.310
as terrorists or more accurately, alleged terrorists.

433
00:18:45.310 --> 00:18:47.420
But it's another thing to describe them as a human being.

434
00:18:47.420 --> 00:18:52.070
He's a man of about my height, about 5'7".

435
00:18:52.070 --> 00:18:55.580
He's slimmer in build than I am.

436
00:18:55.580 --> 00:18:59.180
He has a long beard graying towards the end.

437
00:18:59.180 --> 00:19:02.153
He would often play with his beard as he was talking.

438
00:19:06.954 --> 00:19:09.430
He seemed very articulate and eloquent.

439
00:19:09.430 --> 00:19:12.380
Of course, we were hearing through a translator.

440
00:19:12.380 --> 00:19:14.670
Very soft spoken.

441
00:19:14.670 --> 00:19:17.630
His fingers were deformed.

442
00:19:17.630 --> 00:19:20.880
Some of his fingers were fused together and

443
00:19:24.779 --> 00:19:28.140
the temptation, since it's unusual, was wanting to look

444
00:19:28.140 --> 00:19:29.340
and try to figure out what had happened.

445
00:19:29.340 --> 00:19:31.460
And he didn't have nails on some of his fingers

446
00:19:31.460 --> 00:19:32.293
and the like.

447
00:19:33.740 --> 00:19:36.540
He seemed very forthcoming as we spoke.

448
00:19:36.540 --> 00:19:39.440
He was very concerned about his family.

449
00:19:39.440 --> 00:19:41.960
He's married. He has three children.

450
00:19:41.960 --> 00:19:43.740
He'd never seen his youngest child.

451
00:19:43.740 --> 00:19:45.160
His youngest child was born

452
00:19:45.160 --> 00:19:47.470
after he was apprehended in Afghanistan.

453
00:19:47.470 --> 00:19:48.900
And a lot of the conversation with him

454
00:19:48.900 --> 00:19:50.723
was just trying to get his story.

455
00:19:52.704 --> 00:19:55.704
<v Interviewer>How were you feeling listening to his story?</v>

456
00:19:56.793 --> 00:19:58.190
Was it what you expected

457
00:19:58.190 --> 00:20:02.207
or did you not expect anything when you walked in there?

458
00:20:03.280 --> 00:20:04.903
Was it very moving?

459
00:20:05.851 --> 00:20:08.360
<v ->It was very moving in the sense that</v>

460
00:20:10.370 --> 00:20:15.000
no matter how much I knew he was a human being,

461
00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:16.770
sitting across from him

462
00:20:17.650 --> 00:20:19.970
no further than I'm sitting away from you

463
00:20:19.970 --> 00:20:22.083
made him real as a human being.

464
00:20:23.149 --> 00:20:27.630
I became involved because I cared about the cause

465
00:20:27.630 --> 00:20:29.260
and I was representing people,

466
00:20:29.260 --> 00:20:33.810
but now here was the real human being and he was in prison.

467
00:20:33.810 --> 00:20:37.750
And he had been there at that point for several years,

468
00:20:37.750 --> 00:20:40.530
and now has been there many more years since.

469
00:20:40.530 --> 00:20:41.363
<v Interviewer>Did you think</v>

470
00:20:41.363 --> 00:20:42.590
you could help him at that time?

471
00:20:48.870 --> 00:20:51.700
<v ->To me, one of the most discouraging things</v>

472
00:20:51.700 --> 00:20:56.410
in representing him has been the pace of the litigation.

473
00:20:56.410 --> 00:21:01.280
None of the courts has felt any need to expedite this.

474
00:21:01.280 --> 00:21:06.000
Here's a man who's been in custody since July 2002.

475
00:21:06.000 --> 00:21:08.340
We sit in March of 2010.

476
00:21:08.340 --> 00:21:10.740
He's still never really had a meaningful hearing.

477
00:21:10.740 --> 00:21:12.450
He's had no trial.

478
00:21:12.450 --> 00:21:16.790
And nobody seems to care about the pace of the litigation.

479
00:21:16.790 --> 00:21:18.700
The DC circuit,

480
00:21:18.700 --> 00:21:21.710
from the time the Supreme Court decided in 2004,

481
00:21:21.710 --> 00:21:25.120
doesn't end up deciding its case involving the detainees

482
00:21:25.120 --> 00:21:26.890
for a few more years.

483
00:21:26.890 --> 00:21:29.850
And so what was discouraging to me then,

484
00:21:29.850 --> 00:21:34.410
is discouraging now is just, nobody seems to care

485
00:21:34.410 --> 00:21:37.210
that these are human beings who every day are in prison.

486
00:21:38.510 --> 00:21:39.980
<v Interview>Did you see other detainees</v>

487
00:21:39.980 --> 00:21:41.447
while you were there?

488
00:21:41.447 --> 00:21:45.030
<v ->No. It was very carefully orchestrated.</v>

489
00:21:45.030 --> 00:21:47.820
So we were taken by military personnel

490
00:21:47.820 --> 00:21:50.380
to the place where he was to be questioned.

491
00:21:50.380 --> 00:21:52.400
We questioned him til lunch.

492
00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:54.980
He was then taken away. Questioned him again.

493
00:21:54.980 --> 00:21:58.470
I know that we were interrupted 'cause he was very devout

494
00:21:58.470 --> 00:22:00.240
and he wanted his time to pray

495
00:22:00.240 --> 00:22:02.263
at the intervals where there was prayer.

496
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:04.690
And we'd left him alone during that time.

497
00:22:04.690 --> 00:22:05.523
<v Interviewer>When you say "we,"</v>

498
00:22:05.523 --> 00:22:07.190
was there someone else with you?

499
00:22:07.190 --> 00:22:08.023
<v ->There was.</v>

500
00:22:08.023 --> 00:22:09.720
There was a lawyer

501
00:22:09.720 --> 00:22:11.980
from the Center for Constitutional Rights with me.

502
00:22:11.980 --> 00:22:13.580
<v Interviewer>Who also asked him questions?</v>

503
00:22:13.580 --> 00:22:14.413
<v ->Yes.</v>

504
00:22:14.413 --> 00:22:16.451
<v Interviewer>How did you find a translator?</v>

505
00:22:16.451 --> 00:22:17.284
<v ->Through her.</v>

506
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:21.480
<v Interviewer>And did your client believe in you?</v>

507
00:22:21.480 --> 00:22:23.400
Did he think you were going to help him?

508
00:22:23.400 --> 00:22:24.233
<v ->I don't know.</v>

509
00:22:26.156 --> 00:22:27.740
<v Interviewer>Did he ask anything of you</v>

510
00:22:27.740 --> 00:22:29.160
in terms of his family?

511
00:22:29.160 --> 00:22:31.580
<v ->He wanted us to get in touch with his family.</v>

512
00:22:31.580 --> 00:22:34.900
He wanted to know what we had heard from his brother.

513
00:22:34.900 --> 00:22:36.620
He knew that it was through his brother

514
00:22:36.620 --> 00:22:38.580
that we were representing him.

515
00:22:38.580 --> 00:22:40.890
He wanted to know what we'd heard from his wife.

516
00:22:40.890 --> 00:22:43.230
He was receiving letters from her.

517
00:22:43.230 --> 00:22:47.250
He wanted to us to try to get word back to her and the like.

518
00:22:47.250 --> 00:22:49.330
<v Interviewer>How did the military treat you</v>

519
00:22:49.330 --> 00:22:50.197
during that time?

520
00:22:50.197 --> 00:22:53.407
Did they try to block any of the questions?

521
00:22:53.407 --> 00:22:55.302
<v ->No.</v>

522
00:22:55.302 --> 00:22:58.290
I don't remember if they were in the room, even.

523
00:22:58.290 --> 00:22:59.780
They probably were. I don't remember.

524
00:22:59.780 --> 00:23:01.670
But no way did they interfere.

525
00:23:01.670 --> 00:23:03.830
The interesting thing was,

526
00:23:03.830 --> 00:23:05.790
and this was my experience all the time.

527
00:23:05.790 --> 00:23:08.200
I tried to take very detailed notes

528
00:23:08.200 --> 00:23:09.970
because I didn't want to forget anything.

529
00:23:09.970 --> 00:23:12.417
And there were certain things that he was asking us to do

530
00:23:12.417 --> 00:23:14.430
and I wanted to be sure to try to do those things

531
00:23:14.430 --> 00:23:16.610
that he was asking us to do.

532
00:23:16.610 --> 00:23:18.270
And so I was taking notes

533
00:23:18.270 --> 00:23:21.280
and you have to have your notes cleared.

534
00:23:21.280 --> 00:23:22.113
And-

535
00:23:22.113 --> 00:23:23.360
<v Interviewer>Can you explain that?</v>

536
00:23:23.360 --> 00:23:25.387
<v ->Sure. They take your notes away from you.</v>

537
00:23:25.387 --> 00:23:27.065
And after they, I'm sorry.

538
00:23:27.065 --> 00:23:28.330
<v Interviewer>At what point?</v>

539
00:23:28.330 --> 00:23:29.580
<v ->At the end of each day.</v>

540
00:23:30.530 --> 00:23:32.190
They take the notes away

541
00:23:32.190 --> 00:23:34.910
and you have to put them in an envelope

542
00:23:34.910 --> 00:23:35.890
and you give them to them.

543
00:23:35.890 --> 00:23:38.940
And then if they read them and it's all okay,

544
00:23:38.940 --> 00:23:40.330
you can have your notes back.

545
00:23:40.330 --> 00:23:43.520
My problem is they couldn't read my handwriting.

546
00:23:43.520 --> 00:23:47.780
And so I would have to go to the secured facility

547
00:23:47.780 --> 00:23:52.010
and dictate so that they could clear my notes

548
00:23:52.010 --> 00:23:54.070
because of the handwriting problems.

549
00:23:54.070 --> 00:23:54.903
<v Interviewer>Could you describe</v>

550
00:23:54.903 --> 00:23:56.753
what the secured facility is for?

551
00:23:58.886 --> 00:24:01.410
<v ->It's a kind of place that's almost surreal.</v>

552
00:24:01.410 --> 00:24:02.877
<v Interviewer>Is it in Guantanamo?</v>

553
00:24:02.877 --> 00:24:05.548
<v ->No, the secured facility's in Washington, DC and-</v>

554
00:24:05.548 --> 00:24:06.670
<v Interviewer>So you mean your notes</v>

555
00:24:06.670 --> 00:24:07.503
were taken from Guantanamo-

556
00:24:07.503 --> 00:24:09.820
<v ->From Guantanamo to Washington.</v>

557
00:24:09.820 --> 00:24:11.450
And then you have to go.

558
00:24:11.450 --> 00:24:15.150
And the secured facility is just that.

559
00:24:15.150 --> 00:24:16.780
It's a secured facility

560
00:24:16.780 --> 00:24:19.733
and you can't take things out, you can't bring things in.

561
00:24:20.990 --> 00:24:23.223
<v Interviewer>And who reads your notes there?</v>

562
00:24:24.320 --> 00:24:25.370
<v ->Military officials.</v>

563
00:24:27.910 --> 00:24:30.910
My notes had nothing in any way controversial

564
00:24:30.910 --> 00:24:32.620
but they couldn't read my handwriting

565
00:24:32.620 --> 00:24:34.860
so instead of getting them sent back,

566
00:24:34.860 --> 00:24:36.210
I would have to go to the secured facility

567
00:24:36.210 --> 00:24:37.043
to take care of it.

568
00:24:37.043 --> 00:24:39.470
<v Interviewer>And they didn't redact anything you wrote?</v>

569
00:24:39.470 --> 00:24:41.320
<v ->I didn't have anything at all.</v>

570
00:24:41.320 --> 00:24:42.720
And I knew when I was taking the notes

571
00:24:42.720 --> 00:24:45.140
there was nothing in there that was at all controversial.

572
00:24:45.140 --> 00:24:48.670
That it to say, more than anything else,

573
00:24:48.670 --> 00:24:53.460
I was there to get his story in his words

574
00:24:53.460 --> 00:24:55.040
through a translator.

575
00:24:55.040 --> 00:24:57.210
Also, he was very concerned

576
00:24:57.210 --> 00:25:00.060
about some things that he wanted to us to do.

577
00:25:00.060 --> 00:25:03.410
Some things that to him were most important.

578
00:25:03.410 --> 00:25:06.710
And so I didn't expect that.

579
00:25:06.710 --> 00:25:09.810
That was a big part of what it turned out

580
00:25:09.810 --> 00:25:12.289
that the time spent with him was about.

581
00:25:12.289 --> 00:25:14.270
<v Interviewer>Do you think the military</v>

582
00:25:14.270 --> 00:25:16.720
was listening in on your conversation?

583
00:25:16.720 --> 00:25:18.163
<v ->I don't remember.</v>

584
00:25:18.163 --> 00:25:21.781
I have to admit I accepted whatever was

585
00:25:21.781 --> 00:25:24.238
the conditions of the questioning.

586
00:25:24.238 --> 00:25:26.550
I don't think so.

587
00:25:26.550 --> 00:25:28.155
I think they stood outside of the room

588
00:25:28.155 --> 00:25:30.053
during all of the questioning.

589
00:25:30.911 --> 00:25:33.789
<v Interviewer>Was it filmed, the interview?</v>

590
00:25:33.789 --> 00:25:34.622
<v ->No.</v>

591
00:25:38.260 --> 00:25:39.670
<v Interviewer>Could you describe what happened</v>

592
00:25:40.576 --> 00:25:41.700
after you left the room?

593
00:25:41.700 --> 00:25:43.695
Did you just return back to...

594
00:25:43.695 --> 00:25:45.833
<v ->I remember we were searched again.</v>

595
00:25:48.880 --> 00:25:52.113
Then I remember going to the area where,

596
00:25:52.960 --> 00:25:55.240
on that side of the island, where there was a base

597
00:25:55.240 --> 00:25:58.260
and I remember there being a McDonald's there

598
00:25:58.260 --> 00:26:03.260
and how strange it was to have gone from talking to this man

599
00:26:04.120 --> 00:26:09.120
in a corrugated metal hut with dirt floors,

600
00:26:09.940 --> 00:26:11.780
where he was shackled and chained,

601
00:26:11.780 --> 00:26:14.280
to the banality of eating at McDonald's.

602
00:26:14.280 --> 00:26:18.140
And then we were taken again on the boat across the island.

603
00:26:18.140 --> 00:26:19.900
<v Interviewer>Who left the room first,</v>

604
00:26:19.900 --> 00:26:23.330
you or the lawyers or the client?

605
00:26:23.330 --> 00:26:25.710
<v ->I think we did, if I remember right.</v>

606
00:26:25.710 --> 00:26:27.260
I know we also left during times,

607
00:26:27.260 --> 00:26:29.910
it was for him to pray and he had a prayer rug there.

608
00:26:31.270 --> 00:26:32.400
<v Interviewer>Could he talk to you,</v>

609
00:26:32.400 --> 00:26:33.830
you don't have to reveal anything

610
00:26:33.830 --> 00:26:36.280
but he could talk to you about his conditions?

611
00:26:36.280 --> 00:26:37.113
<v ->Yes.</v>

612
00:26:37.113 --> 00:26:39.400
And we did ask him about his conditions.

613
00:26:39.400 --> 00:26:40.233
<v Interviewer>And his treatment?</v>

614
00:26:40.233 --> 00:26:42.381
<v ->We did ask him about his treatment.</v>

615
00:26:42.381 --> 00:26:43.690
<v Interviewer>And none of that was censored</v>

616
00:26:43.690 --> 00:26:47.100
in any of the notes you took?

617
00:26:47.100 --> 00:26:47.933
<v ->No.</v>

618
00:26:48.801 --> 00:26:52.040
And in fairness, you know, it's the teacher in me,

619
00:26:52.040 --> 00:26:55.530
I don't remember to what extent in my notes

620
00:26:55.530 --> 00:26:57.063
I wrote of those things.

621
00:26:58.670 --> 00:27:03.620
I was much more focused on his story

622
00:27:03.620 --> 00:27:06.190
and again, the things that he wanted us to do for him.

623
00:27:06.190 --> 00:27:08.282
<v Interviewer>What did he want you to do?</v>

624
00:27:08.282 --> 00:27:09.690
<v ->This is the first place where I think</v>

625
00:27:09.690 --> 00:27:10.743
it's attorney-client privilege,

626
00:27:10.743 --> 00:27:13.400
that I don't think I should go there.

627
00:27:13.400 --> 00:27:15.620
'Cause the things that he asked me

628
00:27:15.620 --> 00:27:18.380
would still be relevant today.

629
00:27:18.380 --> 00:27:20.500
<v Interviewer>And why were you so interested in his story?</v>

630
00:27:20.500 --> 00:27:22.560
Was it for the case or just-

631
00:27:22.560 --> 00:27:23.403
<v ->For the case.</v>

632
00:27:25.070 --> 00:27:27.150
I was there as his lawyer

633
00:27:27.150 --> 00:27:32.150
and this was my chance to understand,

634
00:27:32.220 --> 00:27:34.340
how did he come to be in Guantanamo?

635
00:27:34.340 --> 00:27:36.619
And I wanted to know everything he wanted to tell me

636
00:27:36.619 --> 00:27:38.610
about, how did he come to be in Guantanamo?

637
00:27:38.610 --> 00:27:40.910
<v Interviewer>Did you learn something more</v>

638
00:27:40.910 --> 00:27:43.590
about the whole essence of Guantanamo

639
00:27:43.590 --> 00:27:45.150
after this first interview?

640
00:27:45.150 --> 00:27:46.400
Is there something there?

641
00:27:48.330 --> 00:27:52.460
<v ->I think I can say without revealing anything classified</v>

642
00:27:52.460 --> 00:27:54.870
or anything attorney-client privilege,

643
00:27:54.870 --> 00:27:56.820
'cause I'm gonna just tell you my impressions,

644
00:27:56.820 --> 00:28:00.820
not what he said, is my impression was...

645
00:28:02.360 --> 00:28:03.700
Let me try this in my words.

646
00:28:03.700 --> 00:28:05.343
I had no idea why he was there,

647
00:28:06.220 --> 00:28:10.240
that it may be that I wasn't hearing the whole story

648
00:28:10.240 --> 00:28:12.810
from him or I was hearing lies from him.

649
00:28:12.810 --> 00:28:16.150
It may be that he was being sincere and truthful

650
00:28:16.150 --> 00:28:18.660
but I really came away

651
00:28:18.660 --> 00:28:20.620
without any sense of why he was there.

652
00:28:20.620 --> 00:28:22.920
Without giving away attorney-client privilege,

653
00:28:25.010 --> 00:28:27.660
I wanted his story from the time he grew up.

654
00:28:27.660 --> 00:28:30.160
And I wanted to know

655
00:28:30.160 --> 00:28:32.070
up to the moment where he got apprehended.

656
00:28:32.070 --> 00:28:35.060
How did he come to be where he was apprehended?

657
00:28:35.060 --> 00:28:39.020
And I wanted his sense of why he got apprehended.

658
00:28:39.020 --> 00:28:44.020
And I came away with no sense of why he was in Guantanamo.

659
00:28:44.580 --> 00:28:46.130
I walked away thinking

660
00:28:46.130 --> 00:28:49.400
this could be a very dangerous man

661
00:28:49.400 --> 00:28:50.630
or this could be a man who was just

662
00:28:50.630 --> 00:28:52.143
entirely there by mistake.

663
00:28:53.000 --> 00:28:53.950
<v Interviewer>Did that surprise you?</v>

664
00:28:53.950 --> 00:28:56.613
Were you expecting that kind of response in yourself?

665
00:28:58.566 --> 00:29:00.370
<v ->I'm not sure what I was expecting.</v>

666
00:29:00.370 --> 00:29:01.880
I certainly didn't expect that

667
00:29:01.880 --> 00:29:03.210
if he was a dangerous terrorist

668
00:29:03.210 --> 00:29:06.470
he was going to tell me he was a dangerous terrorist.

669
00:29:06.470 --> 00:29:09.930
On the other hand, nor did I expect

670
00:29:09.930 --> 00:29:13.720
the sense of bewilderment of why he was there

671
00:29:13.720 --> 00:29:14.663
that I perceived.

672
00:29:18.020 --> 00:29:21.178
<v Interviewer>So did you go back a second time?</v>

673
00:29:21.178 --> 00:29:22.384
<v ->I did.</v>

674
00:29:22.384 --> 00:29:25.790
And I think you and I were there once at the same time.

675
00:29:25.790 --> 00:29:26.623
<v Interviewer>Right.</v>

676
00:29:26.623 --> 00:29:28.220
<v ->And my sense of dates is so messed up.</v>

677
00:29:28.220 --> 00:29:29.920
<v Interviewer>That was May 2007.</v>

678
00:29:30.850 --> 00:29:33.080
<v ->That was the second time I was there.</v>

679
00:29:33.080 --> 00:29:35.210
<v Interviewer>Before we go to the second time,</v>

680
00:29:35.210 --> 00:29:38.000
on the first time, did you spend more than one day with him?

681
00:29:38.000 --> 00:29:39.472
<v ->I was there two days.</v>

682
00:29:39.472 --> 00:29:40.570
I was there two days each time.

683
00:29:40.570 --> 00:29:42.640
<v Interviewer>Could you have spent longer than two days</v>

684
00:29:42.640 --> 00:29:45.230
or was that the DOD limit?

685
00:29:45.230 --> 00:29:46.403
<v ->I think that was my,</v>

686
00:29:47.690 --> 00:29:50.910
in each instance it's being put in with the rest of my life

687
00:29:50.910 --> 00:29:53.750
and what amount of time seemed...

688
00:29:53.750 --> 00:29:57.180
I think I had the time I needed to get the information

689
00:29:57.180 --> 00:30:00.090
that I realistically could get from him.

690
00:30:00.090 --> 00:30:02.220
<v Interviewer>And I have some other questions</v>

691
00:30:02.220 --> 00:30:05.340
about overall, but let's talk about the second visit.

692
00:30:05.340 --> 00:30:07.670
Was that any different, did you see a difference

693
00:30:07.670 --> 00:30:10.470
in the way they government responded to your presence

694
00:30:10.470 --> 00:30:11.480
as well as...

695
00:30:13.170 --> 00:30:14.003
<v ->No.</v>

696
00:30:14.003 --> 00:30:17.620
They blur together to a great extent in my mind

697
00:30:17.620 --> 00:30:18.750
which is why it's hard to know

698
00:30:18.750 --> 00:30:20.030
which is the first, which second.

699
00:30:20.030 --> 00:30:24.163
The only main difference was that the second time,

700
00:30:25.700 --> 00:30:30.160
his impatience, he was more (indistinct)

701
00:30:30.160 --> 00:30:32.480
He was more interested in what was happening,

702
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:33.850
what were we doing for him.

703
00:30:33.850 --> 00:30:36.533
But again, in both instances, very concerned about,

704
00:30:36.533 --> 00:30:37.920
were we in touch with his brother,

705
00:30:37.920 --> 00:30:40.230
what we'd heard from his wife and the like.

706
00:30:40.230 --> 00:30:42.420
<v Interviewer>Were you able to reveal anything</v>

707
00:30:42.420 --> 00:30:43.520
about his family to him?

708
00:30:43.520 --> 00:30:45.113
There was no restrictions?

709
00:30:46.980 --> 00:30:50.220
<v ->We had a letter from his brother.</v>

710
00:30:50.220 --> 00:30:52.270
I had a letter from his brother to deliver

711
00:30:52.270 --> 00:30:54.003
that they would not let me deliver.

712
00:30:55.330 --> 00:30:57.300
That's the only restriction that I remember,

713
00:30:57.300 --> 00:31:00.030
when I went the time that you were there, right.

714
00:31:00.030 --> 00:31:02.444
I had a letter from his brother that I couldn't deliver.

715
00:31:02.444 --> 00:31:03.940
<v Interviewer>Were you moved?</v>

716
00:31:03.940 --> 00:31:04.890
<v ->Yeah. Same thing.</v>

717
00:31:07.180 --> 00:31:08.350
Right.

718
00:31:08.350 --> 00:31:10.890
And I knew the second 'cause of the...

719
00:31:12.120 --> 00:31:13.870
Right, I've been through it before.

720
00:31:14.830 --> 00:31:16.150
<v Interviewer>I had heard stories</v>

721
00:31:16.150 --> 00:31:18.870
that sometimes some of the detainees were told

722
00:31:18.870 --> 00:31:20.610
that their lawyers were Jewish

723
00:31:20.610 --> 00:31:22.792
and they shouldn't trust them.

724
00:31:22.792 --> 00:31:23.966
Have you heard any of those stories

725
00:31:23.966 --> 00:31:25.218
or did that happened to you?

726
00:31:25.218 --> 00:31:26.580
<v ->I had heard those stories.</v>

727
00:31:26.580 --> 00:31:28.610
And in fact, I think some of those stories

728
00:31:28.610 --> 00:31:32.500
were circulating right before I went May of 2007,

729
00:31:32.500 --> 00:31:35.650
right before one of the times that I went.

730
00:31:35.650 --> 00:31:38.743
And I was sensitive 'cause I am Jewish,

731
00:31:40.220 --> 00:31:45.040
but I did not find that there was any reticence on his part

732
00:31:45.040 --> 00:31:46.710
of talking with me.

733
00:31:46.710 --> 00:31:49.310
I do know that other lawyers became involved

734
00:31:49.310 --> 00:31:50.980
in this case later

735
00:31:50.980 --> 00:31:52.880
and he did not want to meet with them

736
00:31:52.880 --> 00:31:54.120
in some of their later visits.

737
00:31:54.120 --> 00:31:55.780
And didn't meet with them in some later visits.

738
00:31:55.780 --> 00:31:58.906
But I can't say whether that's based on religion at all.

739
00:31:58.906 --> 00:32:00.945
<v Interviewer>Did he trust you as a lawyer</v>

740
00:32:00.945 --> 00:32:01.778
from the beginning?

741
00:32:01.778 --> 00:32:03.701
Did he believe you were his lawyer

742
00:32:03.701 --> 00:32:06.260
and that you weren't a government official?

743
00:32:06.260 --> 00:32:07.537
<v ->I would have no way to know that.</v>

744
00:32:07.537 --> 00:32:08.613
The only thing I can tell you is

745
00:32:08.613 --> 00:32:10.523
that he was willing to talk.

746
00:32:11.426 --> 00:32:15.540
He was willing to meet with me, but to begin with,

747
00:32:15.540 --> 00:32:18.090
it's so hard when you're dealing with a translator.

748
00:32:19.380 --> 00:32:21.060
It's not the same as a conversation

749
00:32:21.060 --> 00:32:23.840
because you have the long pause as well,

750
00:32:23.840 --> 00:32:26.360
waiting for the translator to translate his words

751
00:32:26.360 --> 00:32:27.193
and the long pauses

752
00:32:27.193 --> 00:32:29.230
while waiting for the translator to translate my words.

753
00:32:29.230 --> 00:32:32.923
And so it makes an unusual conversation to begin with.

754
00:32:34.830 --> 00:32:37.240
So many of the cues you can pick up,

755
00:32:37.240 --> 00:32:39.830
either for language or cultural reasons,

756
00:32:39.830 --> 00:32:41.430
you can't interpret.

757
00:32:41.430 --> 00:32:43.670
And it's just such a different situation

758
00:32:43.670 --> 00:32:44.860
when you're talking with somebody

759
00:32:44.860 --> 00:32:46.830
where that person's sitting with shackles on

760
00:32:46.830 --> 00:32:49.117
and you're sitting across from them

761
00:32:49.117 --> 00:32:51.610
and the military presence is outside the door.

762
00:32:51.610 --> 00:32:53.750
So I have no way to assess the extent to which

763
00:32:53.750 --> 00:32:55.080
he really believed I was his lawyer.

764
00:32:55.080 --> 00:32:56.900
<v Interviewer>Was it the same place</v>

765
00:32:56.900 --> 00:32:58.650
that you interviewed him the second time

766
00:32:58.650 --> 00:33:00.380
with the same dirt floor?

767
00:33:00.380 --> 00:33:01.213
<v ->Yeah.</v>

768
00:33:01.213 --> 00:33:04.400
I mean, I can't tell you it's the exact same conditions.

769
00:33:06.943 --> 00:33:08.673
<v Interviewer>Did he look any different?</v>

770
00:33:08.673 --> 00:33:09.506
Did he look...

771
00:33:09.506 --> 00:33:11.130
<v ->More gray.</v>
<v ->More gray.</v>

772
00:33:11.130 --> 00:33:12.420
<v ->More gray.</v>
<v ->He had aged.</v>

773
00:33:12.420 --> 00:33:13.630
<v ->He had aged.</v>

774
00:33:13.630 --> 00:33:15.260
And it wasn't that long between the visits,

775
00:33:15.260 --> 00:33:17.393
you know, a year between those visits.

776
00:33:17.393 --> 00:33:20.383
<v Interviewer>Was his attitude any different to you?</v>

777
00:33:25.790 --> 00:33:27.490
<v ->Maybe a bit more aggressive</v>

778
00:33:27.490 --> 00:33:31.703
about what was going on and why it was going on.

779
00:33:32.714 --> 00:33:33.840
<v Interviewer>Were you able to communicate</v>

780
00:33:33.840 --> 00:33:35.130
with the translator to pick up

781
00:33:35.130 --> 00:33:38.540
some of those cultural norms

782
00:33:38.540 --> 00:33:40.270
that you couldn't identify yourself?

783
00:33:40.270 --> 00:33:42.410
<v ->The translators were wonderful</v>

784
00:33:43.680 --> 00:33:46.780
and I just admire them tremendously,

785
00:33:46.780 --> 00:33:50.017
but no, I don't think that there was any ability

786
00:33:50.017 --> 00:33:52.590
for the translator to be able to pick up.

787
00:33:52.590 --> 00:33:55.770
At least I wasn't there long enough

788
00:33:55.770 --> 00:33:57.660
or with the translators long enough

789
00:33:57.660 --> 00:33:59.873
to be able to pick up those kinds of cues.

790
00:34:01.110 --> 00:34:03.210
<v Interviewer>And it's the same translator both times?</v>

791
00:34:03.210 --> 00:34:04.900
<v ->No, it was different translators.</v>

792
00:34:04.900 --> 00:34:06.687
<v Interviewer>Did it make a difference, do you think?</v>

793
00:34:06.687 --> 00:34:08.087
<v ->No. They're both terrific.</v>

794
00:34:20.616 --> 00:34:23.040
<v Interviewer>Did you ever go to,</v>

795
00:34:23.040 --> 00:34:24.500
none of the meetings you were told

796
00:34:24.500 --> 00:34:26.410
that he didn't want to meet with you

797
00:34:26.410 --> 00:34:30.380
or there were some other delay or anything?

798
00:34:30.380 --> 00:34:31.435
<v ->No.</v>

799
00:34:31.435 --> 00:34:32.570
<v Interviewer>Not in your experience?</v>

800
00:34:32.570 --> 00:34:34.170
<v ->During the time that I was there</v>

801
00:34:34.170 --> 00:34:36.240
I was always able to meet with him.

802
00:34:36.240 --> 00:34:38.640
I was never told he didn't want to meet with me.

803
00:34:40.120 --> 00:34:42.300
There was never any problem in that regard.

804
00:34:42.300 --> 00:34:45.450
<v Interviewer>And after the second time,</v>

805
00:34:45.450 --> 00:34:48.930
what caused you not to go back since then?

806
00:34:48.930 --> 00:34:51.130
<v ->Well, there was a long delay then</v>

807
00:34:51.130 --> 00:34:53.840
in what was going on in terms of the legal case,

808
00:34:53.840 --> 00:34:56.050
because everyone was waiting for what was going to happen

809
00:34:56.050 --> 00:34:57.400
with the Detainee Treatment Act

810
00:34:57.400 --> 00:34:58.550
and the Military Commission Act.

811
00:34:58.550 --> 00:35:02.333
And then some other lawyers became involved,

812
00:35:03.340 --> 00:35:05.010
lawyers from the Center for Constitutional Rights,

813
00:35:05.010 --> 00:35:07.650
a lawyer from American University law school,

814
00:35:07.650 --> 00:35:09.700
and they then went to visit him.

815
00:35:09.700 --> 00:35:13.470
<v Interviewer>And why would the statute, the legislation</v>

816
00:35:13.470 --> 00:35:16.708
and the cases be impeding visits?

817
00:35:16.708 --> 00:35:18.115
What were people waiting on?

818
00:35:18.115 --> 00:35:20.417
<v ->Well, it wasn't that the statute was impeding the visits.</v>

819
00:35:20.417 --> 00:35:24.100
We were waiting to see, what could we do for him.

820
00:35:24.100 --> 00:35:29.100
And if you recall, during this time, the DC Circuit ruled

821
00:35:30.460 --> 00:35:33.110
that these individuals were not entitled to proceed

822
00:35:33.110 --> 00:35:34.660
with habeas corpus

823
00:35:34.660 --> 00:35:37.520
and the Department of Justice made clear

824
00:35:37.520 --> 00:35:38.920
that if that happened,

825
00:35:38.920 --> 00:35:41.730
then no longer were any of the lawyers going to be deemed

826
00:35:41.730 --> 00:35:45.180
to represent the detainees, 'cause we were habeas lawyers.

827
00:35:45.180 --> 00:35:46.950
If there were no habeas petitions pending,

828
00:35:46.950 --> 00:35:49.270
then we wouldn't be able to represent them.

829
00:35:49.270 --> 00:35:52.647
And so there was the limbo status of,

830
00:35:52.647 --> 00:35:56.116
well, his case was one of those before the Supreme Court,

831
00:35:56.116 --> 00:35:56.949
Boumediene,

832
00:35:56.949 --> 00:35:59.616
whether we would be able to continue to represent him

833
00:35:59.616 --> 00:36:02.270
and what our role would be, was going to depend

834
00:36:02.270 --> 00:36:04.143
on what the Supreme Court did in Boumediene.

835
00:36:04.143 --> 00:36:07.520
And other than going to see him,

836
00:36:07.520 --> 00:36:10.590
to keep him apprised of what was going on,

837
00:36:10.590 --> 00:36:13.091
there wasn't anything we could do for him at that stage.

838
00:36:13.091 --> 00:36:14.350
<v Interviewer>How were you feeling about that,</v>

839
00:36:14.350 --> 00:36:16.890
watching this whole thing unfold?

840
00:36:16.890 --> 00:36:18.950
<v ->Well, if you recall,</v>

841
00:36:18.950 --> 00:36:22.133
the Supreme Court initially denied cert in Boumediene.

842
00:36:23.200 --> 00:36:26.750
And I remember thinking then that the consequence of that

843
00:36:26.750 --> 00:36:29.670
if the DC circuit ruling stands

844
00:36:29.670 --> 00:36:32.710
is that he would no longer have me

845
00:36:32.710 --> 00:36:36.450
or Center of Constitutional Rights lawyers representing him.

846
00:36:36.450 --> 00:36:39.460
He would then have the military attorneys.

847
00:36:39.460 --> 00:36:40.720
Now, they're wonderful military attorneys,

848
00:36:40.720 --> 00:36:43.220
but he would no longer have any ability

849
00:36:43.220 --> 00:36:45.040
to have a habeas lawyer.

850
00:36:45.040 --> 00:36:46.610
And it was very discouraging

851
00:36:46.610 --> 00:36:48.937
when the Supreme Court denied Boumediene.

852
00:36:48.937 --> 00:36:50.390
And I remember the decision on the part

853
00:36:50.390 --> 00:36:52.890
of the Guantanamo lawyers to decide to ask

854
00:36:52.890 --> 00:36:55.730
the Supreme Court to reconsider the denial of cert.

855
00:36:55.730 --> 00:36:58.032
It's very unusual for the Supreme Court to grant cert

856
00:36:58.032 --> 00:37:00.383
after denying cert.

857
00:37:02.000 --> 00:37:04.290
<v Interviewer>So were you discouraged, then,</v>

858
00:37:04.290 --> 00:37:07.420
as to where America was going at that point?

859
00:37:07.420 --> 00:37:09.220
Did you think that it was just getting worse

860
00:37:09.220 --> 00:37:12.387
in terms of representation and the right of habeas?

861
00:37:16.810 --> 00:37:19.640
<v ->There's been tremendous discouragement on so many levels</v>

862
00:37:19.640 --> 00:37:22.473
about where America's been going since September 11.

863
00:37:22.473 --> 00:37:25.370
The Guantanamo detainees who've been there

864
00:37:25.370 --> 00:37:28.780
something like Ghareby, for almost 8 years,

865
00:37:28.780 --> 00:37:31.640
is tremendously discouraging, but also of course

866
00:37:31.640 --> 00:37:34.460
Congress passes the Detainee Treatment Act

867
00:37:34.460 --> 00:37:38.010
that says that non-citizens held in Guantanamo

868
00:37:38.010 --> 00:37:40.630
can't have access to federal courts or habeas corpus.

869
00:37:40.630 --> 00:37:43.727
The Supreme Court in June of 2006 says,

870
00:37:43.727 --> 00:37:45.610
"Oh, but that only applies

871
00:37:45.610 --> 00:37:47.710
to those brought to Guantanamo in the future."

872
00:37:47.710 --> 00:37:50.110
Doesn't apply to those like Ghareby who were already there,

873
00:37:50.110 --> 00:37:52.090
which seems a real victory.

874
00:37:52.090 --> 00:37:55.730
Congress then comes back with the Military Commission Act

875
00:37:55.730 --> 00:37:58.290
that says non-citizens held as enemy combatants

876
00:37:58.290 --> 00:38:00.410
have no right to habeas corpus.

877
00:38:00.410 --> 00:38:05.387
The DC circuit then upholds that law,

878
00:38:06.280 --> 00:38:08.220
the Supreme Court denies review,

879
00:38:08.220 --> 00:38:10.880
the Supreme Court reverses itself, takes the case,

880
00:38:10.880 --> 00:38:13.290
And then finally on June 12th, 2008

881
00:38:13.290 --> 00:38:16.160
says that they can't go forward with habeas corpus.

882
00:38:16.160 --> 00:38:18.384
<v Interviewer>Did you think that was a victory</v>

883
00:38:18.384 --> 00:38:20.060
for America or for the rule of law?

884
00:38:20.060 --> 00:38:22.202
When we finally had Boumediene?

885
00:38:22.202 --> 00:38:24.070
<v ->I think Boumediene is a tremendous victory</v>

886
00:38:24.070 --> 00:38:25.670
for the rule of law.

887
00:38:25.670 --> 00:38:29.760
The idea that individuals can be imprisoned indefinitely

888
00:38:29.760 --> 00:38:32.810
without counsel or meaningful hearings is inimical

889
00:38:32.810 --> 00:38:34.700
to the idea of the rule of law.

890
00:38:34.700 --> 00:38:37.600
I think the Supreme Court here was saying that

891
00:38:37.600 --> 00:38:40.730
some law has to apply to those in Guantanamo.

892
00:38:40.730 --> 00:38:43.220
To me, one of the aspects of the Bush administration

893
00:38:43.220 --> 00:38:46.470
position that's most repugnant was

894
00:38:46.470 --> 00:38:49.060
that there was a group of people in a place

895
00:38:49.060 --> 00:38:51.310
where no law could apply.

896
00:38:51.310 --> 00:38:52.880
Their position was the Geneva accords

897
00:38:52.880 --> 00:38:54.320
didn't apply to these individuals

898
00:38:54.320 --> 00:38:56.640
and the United States constitutional statute law

899
00:38:56.640 --> 00:38:58.030
didn't apply to these people.

900
00:38:58.030 --> 00:39:00.550
So the government could do whatever it wanted.

901
00:39:00.550 --> 00:39:02.440
That kind of lawlessness is

902
00:39:02.440 --> 00:39:04.140
the antithesis of the rule of law.

903
00:39:06.170 --> 00:39:07.300
<v Interviewer>Going forward after Boumediene,</v>

904
00:39:07.300 --> 00:39:09.130
are you satisfied

905
00:39:09.130 --> 00:39:11.853
with the way the law has gone forward since then?

906
00:39:13.620 --> 00:39:16.540
<v ->It's gone so slowly.</v>

907
00:39:16.540 --> 00:39:20.420
I'm also very distressed that the plan to close Guantanamo

908
00:39:20.420 --> 00:39:24.250
within a year of Obama's inauguration hasn't happened,

909
00:39:24.250 --> 00:39:26.730
that the most recent word from the administration

910
00:39:26.730 --> 00:39:28.420
is that there's going to be a group of detainees

911
00:39:28.420 --> 00:39:31.900
they plan to continue to hold without trial.

912
00:39:31.900 --> 00:39:35.480
And these may be dangerous individuals.

913
00:39:35.480 --> 00:39:36.880
They may be there by mistake.

914
00:39:36.880 --> 00:39:39.150
But how can we ever know without a fair trial?

915
00:39:39.150 --> 00:39:40.279
<v Interviewer>What does that mean to you</v>

916
00:39:40.279 --> 00:39:41.610
as a constitutional law professor

917
00:39:41.610 --> 00:39:44.033
who's done civil liberties for 30 years?

918
00:39:47.130 --> 00:39:51.620
<v ->I deeply believe in the United States Constitution.</v>

919
00:39:51.620 --> 00:39:54.260
I believe that the Constitution has served this country

920
00:39:54.260 --> 00:39:56.600
incredibly well for over 200 years.

921
00:39:56.600 --> 00:39:58.850
There were moments of disappointments and embarrassment,

922
00:39:58.850 --> 00:40:00.330
like how the Supreme Court dealt

923
00:40:00.330 --> 00:40:01.930
with the interment of the Japanese

924
00:40:01.930 --> 00:40:04.240
or the Supreme Court upholding "separate but equal"

925
00:40:04.240 --> 00:40:06.210
or the Supreme Court protecting slavery.

926
00:40:06.210 --> 00:40:09.170
So I'm not naive in my praise of the Constitution

927
00:40:09.170 --> 00:40:11.730
but overall it's worked well.

928
00:40:11.730 --> 00:40:14.530
And I think it can work very well here.

929
00:40:14.530 --> 00:40:16.160
I don't think we need to have trials

930
00:40:16.160 --> 00:40:17.400
and military tribunals.

931
00:40:17.400 --> 00:40:19.150
We can use Article 3 courts.

932
00:40:19.150 --> 00:40:21.560
I don't think we need to hold people without due process.

933
00:40:21.560 --> 00:40:24.370
We can trust due process to come to the right results.

934
00:40:24.370 --> 00:40:28.370
And the idea that now for eight years,

935
00:40:28.370 --> 00:40:31.420
individuals have been held without due process

936
00:40:31.420 --> 00:40:34.993
and the Constitution is disappointing beyond words.

937
00:40:36.928 --> 00:40:40.110
<v Interviewer>Did you think when Obama was elected</v>

938
00:40:40.110 --> 00:40:42.540
things would change and are you disappointed

939
00:40:42.540 --> 00:40:44.633
with the way he's moving since then?

940
00:40:47.820 --> 00:40:52.300
<v ->In some ways Obama has done what I would hope he would do.</v>

941
00:40:52.300 --> 00:40:54.910
He immediately renounced torture.

942
00:40:54.910 --> 00:40:57.360
Now that doesn't seem like such a big deal,

943
00:40:57.360 --> 00:40:59.760
but as soon as he did so,

944
00:40:59.760 --> 00:41:01.860
Vice President Cheney was on the news

945
00:41:01.860 --> 00:41:04.330
saying we need enhanced interrogation techniques.

946
00:41:04.330 --> 00:41:06.133
But even now, it's torture.

947
00:41:07.180 --> 00:41:08.290
He also made clear

948
00:41:08.290 --> 00:41:11.400
that the United States would follow the law,

949
00:41:11.400 --> 00:41:14.410
that he didn't accept the notion that there was a place

950
00:41:14.410 --> 00:41:16.850
or a group of people where the law didn't apply.

951
00:41:16.850 --> 00:41:18.780
But there's many ways which I've been very disappointed

952
00:41:18.780 --> 00:41:21.130
by what the Obama administration has done.

953
00:41:21.130 --> 00:41:24.420
That they've not carried forth their proposal

954
00:41:24.420 --> 00:41:26.550
to close Guantanamo.

955
00:41:26.550 --> 00:41:27.383
Now, to some extent

956
00:41:27.383 --> 00:41:28.550
that's not the Obama administration's fault.

957
00:41:28.550 --> 00:41:30.610
Congress has passed laws that have limited the ability

958
00:41:30.610 --> 00:41:33.270
to bring people to the United States.

959
00:41:33.270 --> 00:41:34.800
The statement by the Obama administration

960
00:41:34.800 --> 00:41:37.260
they'd continued to have a group of individuals

961
00:41:37.260 --> 00:41:41.560
that they would hold without trial seems to me

962
00:41:41.560 --> 00:41:43.720
a tremendous disappointment.

963
00:41:43.720 --> 00:41:46.830
Their aggressive use of the state secrets doctrine

964
00:41:46.830 --> 00:41:50.630
to get cases dismissed and to prevent accountability.

965
00:41:50.630 --> 00:41:53.920
The refusal to completely renounced rendition.

966
00:41:53.920 --> 00:41:56.623
Those are places where I expected better from Obama.

967
00:42:00.871 --> 00:42:03.310
<v Interviewer>Do you know any more about rendition</v>

968
00:42:03.310 --> 00:42:07.810
or state secrets that you can explain to people

969
00:42:07.810 --> 00:42:10.409
as to exactly what we're talking about

970
00:42:10.409 --> 00:42:12.937
with rendition and state secrets?

971
00:42:12.937 --> 00:42:13.770
<v ->Sure.</v>

972
00:42:14.684 --> 00:42:18.700
The state secrets doctrine is a principle

973
00:42:18.700 --> 00:42:21.100
articulated by the Supreme Court

974
00:42:21.100 --> 00:42:23.000
that says that there are some matters

975
00:42:23.000 --> 00:42:25.670
that courts should not delve into at all.

976
00:42:25.670 --> 00:42:27.730
The most powerful example that I can give

977
00:42:27.730 --> 00:42:29.820
as relates to the War on Terror,

978
00:42:29.820 --> 00:42:32.050
there's a man named Khalid El-Masri

979
00:42:32.050 --> 00:42:35.173
who was apprehended by mistake at the border in Germany.

980
00:42:36.330 --> 00:42:39.740
CIA officials in particular had a hunch

981
00:42:39.740 --> 00:42:40.790
that he might be dangerous.

982
00:42:40.790 --> 00:42:43.050
Apparently this was a hunch based on mistaken identity.

983
00:42:43.050 --> 00:42:45.463
He was taken and he was tortured.

984
00:42:46.400 --> 00:42:48.660
Finally, after extended torture

985
00:42:48.660 --> 00:42:51.617
it was discovered that he made a mistake.

986
00:42:51.617 --> 00:42:53.890
"See, I made a mistake, it was mistaken identity."

987
00:42:53.890 --> 00:42:56.350
And they dumped them on the streets of Albania.

988
00:42:56.350 --> 00:42:57.917
He brought a lawsuit about this

989
00:42:57.917 --> 00:43:00.360
and the government said the suit can't go forward

990
00:43:00.360 --> 00:43:02.440
because it can reveal state secrets.

991
00:43:02.440 --> 00:43:04.220
And the federal district court,

992
00:43:04.220 --> 00:43:06.870
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

993
00:43:06.870 --> 00:43:08.670
agreed with the government in dismissing the case.

994
00:43:08.670 --> 00:43:11.400
There's the Arar case from the Second Circuit,

995
00:43:11.400 --> 00:43:13.760
of a man who was apprehended in Canada

996
00:43:13.760 --> 00:43:16.350
and horribly mistreated.

997
00:43:16.350 --> 00:43:17.820
And the case was dismissed

998
00:43:17.820 --> 00:43:19.860
based on the state secrets doctrine.

999
00:43:19.860 --> 00:43:22.410
The Obama administration has continued to

1000
00:43:22.410 --> 00:43:24.730
aggressively push the state secrets doctrine

1001
00:43:24.730 --> 00:43:26.570
which then prevents accountability.

1002
00:43:26.570 --> 00:43:29.620
There's many ways to protect classified information.

1003
00:43:29.620 --> 00:43:32.220
Suits rarely need to be dismissed in order to do so.

1004
00:43:34.150 --> 00:43:35.317
<v Interviewer>So going forward, Erwin,</v>

1005
00:43:35.317 --> 00:43:38.043
do you think we're going to do better

1006
00:43:38.043 --> 00:43:39.803
than the last eight years?

1007
00:43:39.803 --> 00:43:41.763
You see us doing better?

1008
00:43:42.800 --> 00:43:45.883
<v ->Yes. I think we're doing better and will do better.</v>

1009
00:43:45.883 --> 00:43:48.680
I don't know that we'll do as well as we should.

1010
00:43:48.680 --> 00:43:51.630
I think the inclination of the Obama administration

1011
00:43:51.630 --> 00:43:54.530
is far more to follow the law

1012
00:43:54.530 --> 00:43:57.050
than it was in the Bush administration.

1013
00:43:57.050 --> 00:43:59.440
I don't think there are people in the Obama administration

1014
00:43:59.440 --> 00:44:02.440
like Dick Cheney and David Addington and John Yoo.

1015
00:44:02.440 --> 00:44:04.910
And so I don't see we're going to have memos coming

1016
00:44:04.910 --> 00:44:07.933
in the Obama administration legitimizing torture.

1017
00:44:08.920 --> 00:44:12.843
On the other hand, I worry that the Obama administration,

1018
00:44:14.120 --> 00:44:16.110
whether it's part of the executive

1019
00:44:16.110 --> 00:44:18.610
or whether a desire to be post-partisan,

1020
00:44:18.610 --> 00:44:20.880
isn't willing to go as far as it should.

1021
00:44:20.880 --> 00:44:22.650
I strongly believe that there should have been

1022
00:44:22.650 --> 00:44:24.750
some kind of truth commission,

1023
00:44:24.750 --> 00:44:27.620
something to cover the illegalities that occurred

1024
00:44:27.620 --> 00:44:28.617
during the Bush administration.

1025
00:44:28.617 --> 00:44:31.540
And I think for political reasons the Obama administration

1026
00:44:31.540 --> 00:44:33.860
made the terrible mistake to not do that.

1027
00:44:33.860 --> 00:44:36.070
So I think there's things we will never know

1028
00:44:36.070 --> 00:44:38.310
because there wasn't the non-partisan investigation

1029
00:44:38.310 --> 00:44:39.740
that was required.

1030
00:44:39.740 --> 00:44:42.460
I was pleased when Attorney General Holder said

1031
00:44:42.460 --> 00:44:44.610
that there was going to be a trial

1032
00:44:44.610 --> 00:44:47.120
in federal district court in New York.

1033
00:44:47.120 --> 00:44:48.810
And now the most recent news as well,

1034
00:44:48.810 --> 00:44:51.200
They're going to back away and have a military tribunal.

1035
00:44:51.200 --> 00:44:52.730
I don't think a military tribunal can ever have

1036
00:44:52.730 --> 00:44:55.710
the legitimacy, around the world, in the United States,

1037
00:44:55.710 --> 00:44:58.410
that a trial in an Article 3 court can have.

1038
00:44:58.410 --> 00:45:01.211
<v Interviewer>Where do you see your role going forward?</v>

1039
00:45:01.211 --> 00:45:03.510
Are you still representing Ghareby?

1040
00:45:03.510 --> 00:45:05.420
<v ->I'm one of several lawyers now</v>

1041
00:45:05.420 --> 00:45:07.110
who's representing Ghareby.

1042
00:45:07.110 --> 00:45:09.420
A professor at American Law School and his clinic

1043
00:45:09.420 --> 00:45:10.840
are working at Ghareby's behalf

1044
00:45:10.840 --> 00:45:12.810
as the Center for Constitutional Rights.

1045
00:45:12.810 --> 00:45:15.170
So I'm co-counsel, I'm no longer primary counsel.

1046
00:45:15.170 --> 00:45:17.139
<v Interviewer>Do you see yourself</v>

1047
00:45:17.139 --> 00:45:19.220
going back to Guantanamo?

1048
00:45:19.220 --> 00:45:22.670
<v ->Yeah, if I needed to go back to Guantanamo</v>

1049
00:45:22.670 --> 00:45:23.830
I'd go back in an instant.

1050
00:45:23.830 --> 00:45:25.160
If there's anything that I can do for Ghareby,

1051
00:45:25.160 --> 00:45:27.277
I still consider him a client

1052
00:45:27.277 --> 00:45:29.000
and still consider myself representing him

1053
00:45:29.000 --> 00:45:31.820
though there's other counsel who are involved now.

1054
00:45:31.820 --> 00:45:32.653
<v Interviewer>Are you involved</v>

1055
00:45:32.653 --> 00:45:34.023
in any Guantanamo litigation at all

1056
00:45:34.023 --> 00:45:36.533
or do you see yourself getting involved?

1057
00:45:37.450 --> 00:45:40.450
<v ->One of the changes in my life over this time is</v>

1058
00:45:40.450 --> 00:45:42.460
I've become dean of a new law school.

1059
00:45:42.460 --> 00:45:43.610
And I have discovered that that's

1060
00:45:43.610 --> 00:45:45.810
a quite all-consuming responsibility

1061
00:45:45.810 --> 00:45:49.390
and I can't do all of the things that I was doing before

1062
00:45:49.390 --> 00:45:50.720
and do this.

1063
00:45:50.720 --> 00:45:52.871
And one thing that I've had to give up

1064
00:45:52.871 --> 00:45:55.890
is a lot of pro bono litigation that I used to be doing.

1065
00:45:55.890 --> 00:45:59.100
And so again, if the opportunity presents itself

1066
00:45:59.100 --> 00:46:01.580
to be involved, I will be involved.

1067
00:46:01.580 --> 00:46:04.110
One of the great developments since this all started

1068
00:46:04.110 --> 00:46:08.860
is the presence of so many lawyers representing detainees.

1069
00:46:08.860 --> 00:46:10.900
So many big firms involved.

1070
00:46:10.900 --> 00:46:13.450
When I started it was just Steve Yagman and me.

1071
00:46:13.450 --> 00:46:15.340
<v Interviewer>Do you think your life has changed</v>

1072
00:46:15.340 --> 00:46:18.220
because of your involvement in that first case

1073
00:46:18.220 --> 00:46:20.510
and then your going to Guantanamo?

1074
00:46:25.343 --> 00:46:28.550
<v ->As I think of the things that I've done professionally</v>

1075
00:46:28.550 --> 00:46:31.751
that I'm most proud of, being one of the first lawyers

1076
00:46:31.751 --> 00:46:34.410
to represent Guantanamo detainees,

1077
00:46:34.410 --> 00:46:36.100
being the first lawyer to argue in court

1078
00:46:36.100 --> 00:46:37.800
on behalf of a Guantanamo detainee,

1079
00:46:37.800 --> 00:46:39.610
being the first lawyer to argue in a court of appeals

1080
00:46:39.610 --> 00:46:41.140
on behalf of a Guantanamo detainee

1081
00:46:41.140 --> 00:46:42.670
being the first lawyer to win a case

1082
00:46:42.670 --> 00:46:44.030
on behalf of a Guantanamo detainee,

1083
00:46:44.030 --> 00:46:45.730
are things that I'm very proud of.

1084
00:46:47.596 --> 00:46:49.586
<v Interviewer>Has that changed your life?</v>

1085
00:46:49.586 --> 00:46:50.533
<v ->I don't know.</v>

1086
00:46:50.533 --> 00:46:53.917
I mean, changed my life? Probably not.

1087
00:46:53.917 --> 00:46:55.617
<v Interview>You're still upbeat.</v>

1088
00:46:56.463 --> 00:47:00.930
I mean, I get the feeling that you're still very positive

1089
00:47:00.930 --> 00:47:02.680
about a future in America,

1090
00:47:02.680 --> 00:47:06.380
a future going forward in that.

1091
00:47:06.380 --> 00:47:08.250
Do you think something like this could happen again?

1092
00:47:08.250 --> 00:47:10.010
I mean, we read about it in books

1093
00:47:10.010 --> 00:47:11.673
and now we lived through it.

1094
00:47:12.820 --> 00:47:15.340
<v ->Well, we're not over this.</v>

1095
00:47:15.340 --> 00:47:16.900
The problem I have with the way you phrase the question

1096
00:47:16.900 --> 00:47:17.880
is it makes it sound

1097
00:47:17.880 --> 00:47:20.730
like this episode in American history is past.

1098
00:47:20.730 --> 00:47:24.730
It's not. There's still the people in Guantanamo.

1099
00:47:24.730 --> 00:47:27.140
Some who've been there eight years.

1100
00:47:27.140 --> 00:47:28.770
The idea that we're going to keep people

1101
00:47:28.770 --> 00:47:31.670
in prison for eight years, for their life,

1102
00:47:31.670 --> 00:47:34.293
without due process is just so abhorrent

1103
00:47:34.293 --> 00:47:37.070
to what the Constitution is about.

1104
00:47:37.070 --> 00:47:39.330
I also believe that at some point

1105
00:47:39.330 --> 00:47:41.260
there's going to be another terrorist attack

1106
00:47:41.260 --> 00:47:42.093
on the United States.

1107
00:47:42.093 --> 00:47:45.890
I hope that I'm wrong, but it seems almost inevitable.

1108
00:47:45.890 --> 00:47:48.300
And I fear that when that happens,

1109
00:47:48.300 --> 00:47:51.420
that what followed September 11th come all over again.

1110
00:47:51.420 --> 00:47:54.070
There'll be something like the Patriot Act adopted,

1111
00:47:54.070 --> 00:47:56.310
there'll be pressure to do things

1112
00:47:56.310 --> 00:48:00.310
like extreme interrogation, things like Guantanamo.

1113
00:48:00.310 --> 00:48:02.410
I hope there'll be an administration

1114
00:48:02.410 --> 00:48:03.950
with a different inclination

1115
00:48:03.950 --> 00:48:05.610
than the Bush administration had,

1116
00:48:05.610 --> 00:48:08.220
one more oriented towards the rule of law,

1117
00:48:08.220 --> 00:48:10.730
but throughout American history

1118
00:48:10.730 --> 00:48:13.160
when there's been a crisis, especially foreign-based one,

1119
00:48:13.160 --> 00:48:15.120
the response has been repression,

1120
00:48:15.120 --> 00:48:16.400
and the events of September 11th

1121
00:48:16.400 --> 00:48:18.300
have tragically followed that pattern.

1122
00:48:24.362 --> 00:48:26.990
<v Interviewer>Do you think even someone like Obama</v>

1123
00:48:26.990 --> 00:48:30.400
could end up in that situation of repression

1124
00:48:30.400 --> 00:48:33.100
'cause the executive has that power

1125
00:48:33.100 --> 00:48:35.683
and that's just what seems to happen?

1126
00:48:38.530 --> 00:48:42.700
<v ->I would hope that Obama as a lawyer</v>

1127
00:48:42.700 --> 00:48:45.470
is a constitutional law professor.

1128
00:48:45.470 --> 00:48:49.000
We have far more of a commitment to the rule of law

1129
00:48:49.000 --> 00:48:52.130
than his predecessor, and I'd hope that those he's appointed

1130
00:48:52.130 --> 00:48:54.210
to high level positions would have far more

1131
00:48:54.210 --> 00:48:56.130
of a commitment to rule of law

1132
00:48:56.130 --> 00:48:58.980
than those who occupied similar positions

1133
00:48:58.980 --> 00:49:01.270
in his predecessor's administration.

1134
00:49:01.270 --> 00:49:03.977
And there are so many ways in which the Obama administration

1135
00:49:03.977 --> 00:49:06.730
is better than the Bush administration,

1136
00:49:06.730 --> 00:49:07.990
but there are too many ways

1137
00:49:07.990 --> 00:49:09.530
where it's continued the policies

1138
00:49:09.530 --> 00:49:10.540
of the Bush administration.

1139
00:49:10.540 --> 00:49:11.940
And it's very disappointing.

1140
00:49:13.358 --> 00:49:16.950
(indistinct talking in background)

1141
00:49:16.950 --> 00:49:18.970
<v Woman>No, I would like confirmation.</v>

1142
00:49:18.970 --> 00:49:21.480
Sounds as though you did not feel

1143
00:49:21.480 --> 00:49:24.390
that there was obstruction going on

1144
00:49:24.390 --> 00:49:25.970
from the government towards you,

1145
00:49:25.970 --> 00:49:28.930
that maybe they were inept and they're very slow,

1146
00:49:28.930 --> 00:49:31.577
but do you see the overall pattern

1147
00:49:31.577 --> 00:49:35.903
of how slow things are as obstructionist?

1148
00:49:38.030 --> 00:49:41.050
<v ->There were many lawyers who I've heard</v>

1149
00:49:41.050 --> 00:49:43.240
felt that the government was being obstructionist

1150
00:49:43.240 --> 00:49:44.830
towards them.

1151
00:49:44.830 --> 00:49:46.270
I never felt that the people

1152
00:49:46.270 --> 00:49:48.250
in the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice

1153
00:49:48.250 --> 00:49:51.150
who I was dealing with were being obstructionist towards me.

1154
00:49:51.150 --> 00:49:53.895
There were instances where things got canceled

1155
00:49:53.895 --> 00:49:58.500
and had to be rescheduled, but not unduly.

1156
00:49:58.500 --> 00:50:01.623
So there was always an explanation that made sense.

1157
00:50:02.769 --> 00:50:05.410
It took a long time to get things done sometimes

1158
00:50:05.410 --> 00:50:08.303
but I expect that dealing with the government.

1159
00:50:09.860 --> 00:50:11.060
<v Woman>Another question.</v>

1160
00:50:11.060 --> 00:50:15.950
You talked about when you got all those emails

1161
00:50:15.950 --> 00:50:18.610
and voicemails about being more public

1162
00:50:18.610 --> 00:50:19.870
about what was going on.

1163
00:50:19.870 --> 00:50:23.670
Do you have any other regrets in terms of the process

1164
00:50:23.670 --> 00:50:25.969
of what either you or other folks

1165
00:50:25.969 --> 00:50:28.610
who are working on this issue

1166
00:50:28.610 --> 00:50:29.940
could have done differently,

1167
00:50:29.940 --> 00:50:32.870
to have maybe informed the U.S. public

1168
00:50:32.870 --> 00:50:37.533
or done something more to bring back the rule of law?

1169
00:50:41.750 --> 00:50:44.890
<v ->I wish that I had much more aggressively</v>

1170
00:50:44.890 --> 00:50:47.559
tried to stay in touch with Ghareby.

1171
00:50:47.559 --> 00:50:50.440
I think there were too many gaps in my communication

1172
00:50:50.440 --> 00:50:53.130
with him during times that nothing was going on

1173
00:50:53.130 --> 00:50:56.323
and I think that that was a mistake on my part.

1174
00:50:57.990 --> 00:51:01.053
In terms of reaching out to the American public,

1175
00:51:02.300 --> 00:51:04.747
I think that happened relatively quickly, but

1176
00:51:08.060 --> 00:51:09.540
I wish it had happened faster,

1177
00:51:09.540 --> 00:51:12.000
I wish it had happened in louder voices,

1178
00:51:12.000 --> 00:51:13.900
but I think in time,

1179
00:51:13.900 --> 00:51:16.050
the American public was certainly informed

1180
00:51:16.050 --> 00:51:16.950
of what was happening.

1181
00:51:16.950 --> 00:51:19.180
I think the difficulty is that I don't think

1182
00:51:19.180 --> 00:51:21.360
that the American public has ever been able to see

1183
00:51:21.360 --> 00:51:23.410
the Guantanamo detainees as human beings,

1184
00:51:24.590 --> 00:51:27.620
that maybe that'll be the beauty and the brilliance

1185
00:51:27.620 --> 00:51:30.210
of this project, but the Guantanamo detainees

1186
00:51:30.210 --> 00:51:34.510
can still too easily be characterized as terrorists

1187
00:51:34.510 --> 00:51:37.890
and not being presented as human beings.

1188
00:51:37.890 --> 00:51:41.160
I was so struck when there was the commercials last week

1189
00:51:41.160 --> 00:51:43.790
in the news and doing some media stuff around them

1190
00:51:43.790 --> 00:51:44.957
where it was being presented as,

1191
00:51:44.957 --> 00:51:47.790
"How could these lawyers who represented terrorists

1192
00:51:47.790 --> 00:51:49.960
now be in high-level positions in the government?"

1193
00:51:49.960 --> 00:51:53.230
And of course, if anything, I say "alleged terrorists."

1194
00:51:53.230 --> 00:51:54.870
we don't know why they're there.

1195
00:51:54.870 --> 00:51:58.090
But I think the fact that they're not presented

1196
00:51:58.090 --> 00:52:01.530
as human beings makes it too easy to caricature them.

1197
00:52:01.530 --> 00:52:03.470
And I think that the lawyers who have been to see them

1198
00:52:03.470 --> 00:52:05.120
share some of the blame for that.

1199
00:52:08.880 --> 00:52:10.230
<v Woman>Because why?</v>

1200
00:52:10.230 --> 00:52:12.180
<v ->I don't think we've done a good enough job</v>

1201
00:52:12.180 --> 00:52:15.900
to tell their stories, to make them seem human.

1202
00:52:15.900 --> 00:52:17.950
To the extent that people like me are the ones

1203
00:52:17.950 --> 00:52:18.880
who have gone to see them,

1204
00:52:18.880 --> 00:52:21.123
we're the ones who have to describe them.

1205
00:52:22.270 --> 00:52:24.440
I unfortunately am not very good at descriptions.

1206
00:52:24.440 --> 00:52:27.310
I would be a terrible person as an eye witness

1207
00:52:27.310 --> 00:52:28.630
but I still want to be able to tell

1208
00:52:28.630 --> 00:52:29.880
what this man looks like.

1209
00:52:34.080 --> 00:52:35.904
<v Interviewer>I think in every war</v>

1210
00:52:35.904 --> 00:52:38.250
you always have us against them, right?

1211
00:52:38.250 --> 00:52:41.493
(indistinct) And that's what keeps wars going,

1212
00:52:41.493 --> 00:52:42.760
don't you think?

1213
00:52:42.760 --> 00:52:43.593
<v ->Sure.</v>

1214
00:52:43.593 --> 00:52:44.426
You go back to World War II

1215
00:52:44.426 --> 00:52:46.410
and the general who was responsible

1216
00:52:46.410 --> 00:52:48.727
for the Japanese internment, General DeWitt said,

1217
00:52:48.727 --> 00:52:50.367
and I can still recite the quote verbatim,

1218
00:52:50.367 --> 00:52:51.360
"A Jap is a Jap,

1219
00:52:51.360 --> 00:52:53.670
makes no difference if he's an American or not."

1220
00:52:53.670 --> 00:52:55.794
During World War I, states like Nebraska

1221
00:52:55.794 --> 00:52:58.880
prohibited the teaching of the German language.

1222
00:52:58.880 --> 00:53:03.880
And so there is a vilifying and a caricaturing of the enemy.

1223
00:53:04.030 --> 00:53:05.633
And it's certainly gone on here.

1224
00:53:08.720 --> 00:53:10.150
<v Interviewer>So looking back then,</v>

1225
00:53:10.150 --> 00:53:12.824
I guess I'll ask that same question again.

1226
00:53:12.824 --> 00:53:15.220
You could have perhaps done more

1227
00:53:15.220 --> 00:53:16.630
and other people could have done more

1228
00:53:16.630 --> 00:53:21.630
and it's easier to say that now, but maybe we all wish...

1229
00:53:24.784 --> 00:53:27.510
<v ->Yeah, I do especially at the beginning.</v>

1230
00:53:27.510 --> 00:53:31.230
After a time, there were so many lawyers involved

1231
00:53:31.230 --> 00:53:34.395
that I think that there was less need.

1232
00:53:34.395 --> 00:53:36.410
You've written a wonderful book,

1233
00:53:36.410 --> 00:53:38.760
Joe Margulies wrote a great book on Guantanamo.

1234
00:53:40.070 --> 00:53:41.810
There were many people writing

1235
00:53:41.810 --> 00:53:43.170
to inform the American public.

1236
00:53:43.170 --> 00:53:45.303
There's been plays done about it.

1237
00:53:46.275 --> 00:53:48.830
The Red Cross has done reports about it.

1238
00:53:48.830 --> 00:53:52.046
But I think that the unique opportunity that I had

1239
00:53:52.046 --> 00:53:55.660
and the unique way that I failed was at the outset,

1240
00:53:55.660 --> 00:54:00.080
that with filing the first lawsuit,

1241
00:54:00.080 --> 00:54:02.070
I had a platform to criticize

1242
00:54:02.070 --> 00:54:04.080
what the United States government was doing.

1243
00:54:04.080 --> 00:54:05.860
And I didn't use the platform.

1244
00:54:05.860 --> 00:54:09.280
And I made the conscious choice that I was too afraid

1245
00:54:09.280 --> 00:54:12.790
of being accused of doing this for media exposure.

1246
00:54:12.790 --> 00:54:14.120
I didn't want to be perceived

1247
00:54:14.120 --> 00:54:15.960
that that's why I was involved,

1248
00:54:15.960 --> 00:54:20.670
so decided not to take the media invitations that were there

1249
00:54:20.670 --> 00:54:21.763
and I made a mistake.

1250
00:54:23.560 --> 00:54:24.843
<v Interviewer>People might not have</v>

1251
00:54:24.843 --> 00:54:25.676
believed you anyway, right?

1252
00:54:25.676 --> 00:54:26.509
Don't you think?

1253
00:54:28.380 --> 00:54:31.500
<v ->I think people who sent me the hate mail</v>

1254
00:54:32.983 --> 00:54:35.800
weren't going to be convinced by anything that I said.

1255
00:54:35.800 --> 00:54:38.950
On the other hand, there are lots of people

1256
00:54:38.950 --> 00:54:40.770
who might've been open-minded.

1257
00:54:40.770 --> 00:54:42.890
And if they had a constitutional law professor

1258
00:54:42.890 --> 00:54:45.810
explaining to them why it violates international law

1259
00:54:45.810 --> 00:54:47.340
and constitutional law to do

1260
00:54:47.340 --> 00:54:49.810
what the United States government was doing,

1261
00:54:49.810 --> 00:54:53.020
maybe it could impart a shifting public sentiment

1262
00:54:53.020 --> 00:54:54.170
a bit earlier.

1263
00:54:54.170 --> 00:54:57.460
That's the platform that I had the opportunity to have

1264
00:54:57.460 --> 00:54:59.390
in January 2002.

1265
00:54:59.390 --> 00:55:02.110
And I made the mistake in not using it.

1266
00:55:02.110 --> 00:55:03.596
<v Woman>I do have another question.</v>

1267
00:55:03.596 --> 00:55:04.429
<v ->Sure.</v>

1268
00:55:04.429 --> 00:55:06.753
<v Woman>Some people have been able</v>

1269
00:55:07.923 --> 00:55:11.560
to leave Guantanamo who appear to be guilty.

1270
00:55:11.560 --> 00:55:14.130
And some people are still at Guantanamo

1271
00:55:14.130 --> 00:55:16.170
who appear to be innocent.

1272
00:55:16.170 --> 00:55:20.150
Do you have any sense of what determined

1273
00:55:20.150 --> 00:55:24.160
whether somebody was able to leave Guantanamo or not?

1274
00:55:24.160 --> 00:55:26.091
Your client is still there.

1275
00:55:26.091 --> 00:55:30.330
Do you understand the reasoning?

1276
00:55:30.330 --> 00:55:34.820
<v ->My sense is, it's all based on intelligence information</v>

1277
00:55:34.820 --> 00:55:36.570
that the lawyers have no access to,

1278
00:55:37.480 --> 00:55:39.450
that the government knows things

1279
00:55:39.450 --> 00:55:42.150
about some of the detainees that never shows up

1280
00:55:42.150 --> 00:55:45.820
in the Combatant Status Review Tribunals,

1281
00:55:45.820 --> 00:55:48.180
that causes them to believe

1282
00:55:48.180 --> 00:55:50.470
that these are the people they should keep

1283
00:55:50.470 --> 00:55:52.070
and these are the people that should let go.

1284
00:55:52.070 --> 00:55:54.000
And the difficulty of the secret evidence

1285
00:55:54.000 --> 00:55:55.470
is that-

1286
00:55:55.470 --> 00:55:56.560
<v ->It's secret.</v>
<v ->It's secret.</v>

1287
00:55:56.560 --> 00:55:59.293
There's no opportunity to know or to rebut it.

1288
00:56:00.920 --> 00:56:03.470
So I can say to you in all honesty that I don't know

1289
00:56:03.470 --> 00:56:04.793
why Ghareby is there.

1290
00:56:08.840 --> 00:56:10.760
<v Woman>But overall it sounds as though</v>

1291
00:56:10.760 --> 00:56:12.650
your conclusion is that most of the folks

1292
00:56:12.650 --> 00:56:16.650
who are still there are guilty of a terrorist attack.

1293
00:56:16.650 --> 00:56:18.510
<v ->I have no conclusion.</v>
<v ->Okay.</v>

1294
00:56:18.510 --> 00:56:20.260
<v ->No, I have no conclusion as to whether</v>

1295
00:56:20.260 --> 00:56:22.900
those who are still there should be there,

1296
00:56:22.900 --> 00:56:26.720
should be detained, tried or not.

1297
00:56:26.720 --> 00:56:27.553
Let me be clear.

1298
00:56:27.553 --> 00:56:31.450
I think everyone is entitled to due process.

1299
00:56:31.450 --> 00:56:34.070
Everyone should be tried.

1300
00:56:34.070 --> 00:56:39.070
Whether some who are there should be released without trial

1301
00:56:39.360 --> 00:56:42.170
whether some are likely to be convicted at trial,

1302
00:56:42.170 --> 00:56:43.003
I have no opinion

1303
00:56:43.003 --> 00:56:44.900
because I don't have access to any of the evidence.

1304
00:56:44.900 --> 00:56:49.120
All I believe is that long, long ago

1305
00:56:49.120 --> 00:56:51.170
trials should be held with these individuals.

1306
00:56:51.170 --> 00:56:53.090
And I prefer very much they be trials

1307
00:56:53.090 --> 00:56:54.410
in an Article 3 court,

1308
00:56:54.410 --> 00:56:55.960
'cause I believe that no military tribunal

1309
00:56:55.960 --> 00:56:58.873
can have the credibility of a federal court.

1310
00:57:00.770 --> 00:57:01.790
<v Interviewer>Erwin, I need to ask you</v>

1311
00:57:01.790 --> 00:57:03.654
one more question here.
<v ->Anything.</v>

1312
00:57:03.654 --> 00:57:04.980
<v Interviewer>In 50 plus years,</v>

1313
00:57:04.980 --> 00:57:08.690
did you ever think you would see something

1314
00:57:08.690 --> 00:57:11.350
like you saw in the last eight years?

1315
00:57:11.350 --> 00:57:12.580
Having been a historian,

1316
00:57:12.580 --> 00:57:16.780
having seen over the 200 years of America

1317
00:57:16.780 --> 00:57:18.430
that things like this did happen?

1318
00:57:22.040 --> 00:57:24.513
<v ->Every time the United States has dealt</v>

1319
00:57:24.513 --> 00:57:26.700
with a foreign-based crisis

1320
00:57:26.700 --> 00:57:29.350
there's been some form of repression.

1321
00:57:29.350 --> 00:57:32.890
It's taken a different form each time.

1322
00:57:32.890 --> 00:57:36.130
In World War I, you had the suppression of speech

1323
00:57:36.130 --> 00:57:38.820
of those criticizing the war, the Palmer Raids

1324
00:57:38.820 --> 00:57:41.370
rounding up people who were non-citizens.

1325
00:57:41.370 --> 00:57:42.203
In World War II,

1326
00:57:42.203 --> 00:57:45.922
you had 110,000 Japanese Americans being interned.

1327
00:57:45.922 --> 00:57:49.380
During the McCarthy era, you had people losing their jobs

1328
00:57:49.380 --> 00:57:52.263
and their freedom based on ill-founded suspicion.

1329
00:57:53.100 --> 00:57:57.150
Soon as September 11th happened, I believed

1330
00:57:57.150 --> 00:58:00.397
that we would have seen some deprivation of liberties

1331
00:58:00.397 --> 00:58:02.210
and some repression.

1332
00:58:02.210 --> 00:58:03.600
I don't think I could have imagined

1333
00:58:03.600 --> 00:58:05.630
it would have taken the form that it did.

1334
00:58:05.630 --> 00:58:07.852
I never thought that the United States government

1335
00:58:07.852 --> 00:58:11.584
would engage in systematic torture as it did.

1336
00:58:11.584 --> 00:58:13.590
I never thought the United States government

1337
00:58:13.590 --> 00:58:15.970
would imprison people for eight years

1338
00:58:15.970 --> 00:58:18.900
and say that it didn't have to provide them due process.

1339
00:58:18.900 --> 00:58:20.600
But unfortunately I think this,

1340
00:58:20.600 --> 00:58:22.520
one of the worst patterns of American history,

1341
00:58:22.520 --> 00:58:23.520
has repeated itself.

1342
00:58:25.160 --> 00:58:26.660
<v Interviewer>How will the world look at us</v>

1343
00:58:26.660 --> 00:58:28.613
50 years from now?

1344
00:58:28.613 --> 00:58:31.210
<v ->I think this is a tremendous embarrassment</v>

1345
00:58:31.210 --> 00:58:33.330
to the United States.

1346
00:58:33.330 --> 00:58:36.170
It's not possible to go anywhere in the world,

1347
00:58:36.170 --> 00:58:39.853
as you know, without people talking about Guantanamo,

1348
00:58:40.850 --> 00:58:43.450
the torture done by the American military.

1349
00:58:43.450 --> 00:58:46.980
I think to the extent that the United States

1350
00:58:46.980 --> 00:58:49.870
was a moral leader in the world,

1351
00:58:49.870 --> 00:58:52.980
especially after World War II and Nuremberg,

1352
00:58:52.980 --> 00:58:54.130
that's all been squandered

1353
00:58:54.130 --> 00:58:56.180
and it's not going to be easily regained.

1354
00:58:58.970 --> 00:59:01.166
<v Interviewer>Is there something I didn't ask you</v>

1355
00:59:01.166 --> 00:59:04.763
that you can share with us?

1356
00:59:10.028 --> 00:59:10.861
<v ->I turn to you.</v>

1357
00:59:10.861 --> 00:59:11.763
Is there anything else I can talk about

1358
00:59:11.763 --> 00:59:13.513
that would be useful?

1359
00:59:14.569 --> 00:59:15.457
<v Woman>Johnny, do you have anything?</v>

1360
00:59:15.457 --> 00:59:16.830
<v Johnny>No, no.</v>

1361
00:59:16.830 --> 00:59:19.620
<v Interviewer>It just seems that when people look back</v>

1362
00:59:19.620 --> 00:59:20.900
at this time, they're going to wonder,

1363
00:59:20.900 --> 00:59:22.870
how could we be like this?

1364
00:59:22.870 --> 00:59:25.720
<v Woman>Yeah, what could Americans do?</v>

1365
00:59:25.720 --> 00:59:29.360
Those Americans who believe as you do

1366
00:59:29.360 --> 00:59:32.440
that it's time to restore the rule of law.

1367
00:59:32.440 --> 00:59:34.110
What would you suggest to them?

1368
00:59:34.110 --> 00:59:37.930
How do they go about as individuals

1369
00:59:37.930 --> 00:59:42.693
who are not habeas lawyers, to work on this issue?

1370
00:59:50.420 --> 00:59:54.280
<v ->Part of the difficulty in rallying public support</v>

1371
00:59:54.280 --> 00:59:55.993
for the Guantanamo detainees is,

1372
00:59:55.993 --> 00:59:58.423
it's so removed from people's lives.

1373
00:59:59.630 --> 01:00:02.585
In my lifetime I thought that the thing

1374
01:00:02.585 --> 01:00:06.230
that most mobilized people was the Vietnam War.

1375
01:00:06.230 --> 01:00:07.890
'Cause as people feared being drafted

1376
01:00:07.890 --> 01:00:09.190
or having loved ones being drafted,

1377
01:00:09.190 --> 01:00:10.873
it gave them a personal stake.

1378
01:00:11.770 --> 01:00:15.120
So few people in the United States have contact to anybody

1379
01:00:15.120 --> 01:00:17.550
who has contact to anybody in Guantanamo.

1380
01:00:17.550 --> 01:00:19.170
It just doesn't touch their lives,

1381
01:00:19.170 --> 01:00:21.530
so it's very hard to mobilize people.

1382
01:00:21.530 --> 01:00:24.960
Those in Guantanamo have been caricatured as terrorists.

1383
01:00:24.960 --> 01:00:27.640
There's no sympathy for terrorists.

1384
01:00:27.640 --> 01:00:29.760
And I don't think for many people

1385
01:00:29.760 --> 01:00:32.330
there's an instinctive belief in due process.

1386
01:00:32.330 --> 01:00:34.320
It's "These are terrible people.

1387
01:00:34.320 --> 01:00:36.130
They deserve what's come to them."

1388
01:00:36.130 --> 01:00:38.870
And so it's very hard to rally public support

1389
01:00:38.870 --> 01:00:40.740
for those in Guantanamo.

1390
01:00:40.740 --> 01:00:45.740
I think that what has to be emphasized is our core values,

1391
01:00:46.040 --> 01:00:51.040
that our most cherished values are about due process

1392
01:00:51.420 --> 01:00:52.920
and things the Constitution provides.

1393
01:00:52.920 --> 01:00:54.670
The other thing that I've noted is

1394
01:00:54.670 --> 01:00:56.700
I've given countless speeches about civil liberties

1395
01:00:56.700 --> 01:00:59.400
and the war on terrorism since September 11th.

1396
01:00:59.400 --> 01:01:03.160
Those in the audience who were most sympathetic to me

1397
01:01:03.160 --> 01:01:05.520
are those who have served in the military

1398
01:01:05.520 --> 01:01:07.440
or have loved ones have served in the military.

1399
01:01:07.440 --> 01:01:11.060
So many times I've heard, "How can the United States

1400
01:01:11.060 --> 01:01:14.700
expect foreign countries to follow the rule of law,

1401
01:01:14.700 --> 01:01:17.260
the Geneva accords, when they have American prisoners,

1402
01:01:17.260 --> 01:01:19.753
if we don't follow the rule of law and the Geneva accords

1403
01:01:19.753 --> 01:01:21.527
when we have foreign prisoners?"

1404
01:01:22.830 --> 01:01:25.060
<v Interviewer>So what can individuals do?</v>

1405
01:01:25.060 --> 01:01:27.093
They who aren't lawyers, you think?

1406
01:01:28.090 --> 01:01:30.210
<v ->I think individuals can be most effective</v>

1407
01:01:30.210 --> 01:01:31.890
by joining organizations.

1408
01:01:31.890 --> 01:01:35.107
And so I think the organizations like the ACLU

1409
01:01:35.107 --> 01:01:37.580
and the Center for Constitutional Rights

1410
01:01:37.580 --> 01:01:39.740
have just been so important.

1411
01:01:39.740 --> 01:01:42.670
I think individuals also have the ability to speak out

1412
01:01:42.670 --> 01:01:46.080
to representatives, to senators, even to the President

1413
01:01:46.930 --> 01:01:50.420
to have voices heard that this isn't my country

1414
01:01:50.420 --> 01:01:51.660
when it's doing these things,

1415
01:01:51.660 --> 01:01:54.210
this isn't the America that I grew up believing in.

1416
01:01:57.315 --> 01:01:58.273
Other questions?

1417
01:01:59.930 --> 01:02:01.830
<v Interviewer>I think that</v>

1418
01:02:01.830 --> 01:02:02.760
if you have nothing else,

1419
01:02:02.760 --> 01:02:05.374
that was great, Erwin, that was fabulous.

1420
01:02:05.374 --> 01:02:06.615
Thank you so much. Thank you.

1421
01:02:06.615 --> 01:02:07.922
<v Woman>Great. Thank you.</v>

1422
01:02:07.922 --> 01:02:08.964
(applauding)

1423
01:02:08.964 --> 01:02:11.381
(indistinct)

