- There's been a lot of circumstances in our country's history where civil liberties have been challenged, especially liberties of people who are not, who are of other groups, who are not Americans clearly identified or, or in the Japanese-Americans case were not identified as people thought of Americans at that time. So I think it will just fall into that list of things that happened. And I hope, and I'm only somewhat hopeful that, that another thing that will have happened that international law will hopefully grow from this experience and develop better rules on detention questions, right? The area where growth is needed is - there doesn't need to be new rules about torture, that's already there but there does need to be new rules about who can be detained in a conflict with a non-state actor. What process are they entitled to? When does the conflict end? What do we do where the home country has poor human rights record, and that human rights record prevents us from sending them home? Those are all major areas where the law needs to catch up with the reality that's around us. And so I hope that somebody will look back at this 30 years from now or 50 years from now and say that while we had all these problems for 10 years, they were catalysts for this legal development that, so the next time this conflict happens, there are good rules and the president can decide, okay, well we'll just follow what we've always done which is provide this kind of hearing, limit detention authority of these sort of people, this is when we release them, this is the system we use when we can't send them home. And, you know, they have a good set of answers to these questions.